Judaizing Jerusalem

Holy Sepulture - Crosses etched in wall (Nick Marouf)

Stephen Lendman. 6 July 2010

The Middle East Monitor (MEM) covers significant regional issues and events through its weekly newspaper and reports like Samira Quraishy’s September 2009 Briefing Paper titled, “The Judaization of Jerusalem,” discussing Israel’s “escalating campaign of land seizures, house demolitions and eviction(s) of Palestinians.”

Israeli scholars agree, including Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Professor Oren Yiftachel, in a 1999 paper titled “Ethnocracy: the Politics of Judaizing Israel/Palestine,” saying Israel is an ethnocratic regime “enhanc(ing) a rule by, and for, a specific ethnos, and a dominance of ethnicity over citizenship (by) facilitat(ing) the expansion of one ethnic group over contested territory or polity.” It evolved around “the central Zionist (uni-ethnic) project of Judaizing and de-Arabising Israel/Palestine, (and as a consequence undermining) equal citizenship and popular sovereignty,” reserving it solely for Jews, exposing the myth of a democratic nation.

Hebrew University Professor Moshe Ma’oz, Ankara’s Bilkent University Professor Jeremy Salt, Professor Norman Finkelstein, Professor James Petras, and many other scholars agree that Israel pursued this policy since 1967, planning it decades earlier, based on the Zionist notion of dispossessing Arabs to make greater Israel an exclusive Jewish state.

Jerusalem is its epicenter, a religiously important city for Christians, Muslims and Jews, today the scene of epic injustice and discrimination of its Palestinian residents.

For Zionists, the city is politically important, as its historic capital, national and religious center, as well as the symbol of Judaism’s revival and prominence. For Christians, it’s where Jesus lived and died, and for Muslims it’s their third holiest site (the Dome of the Rock on the Temple Mount and Al-Aqsa Mosque) after Mecca’s Sacred Mosque and the Mosque of the Prophet in Madina.

Settlement Expansions 2009

Settlement Expansions 2009 (Click for larger image)

After its 1967 annexation, East Jerusalem underwent legal and bureaucratic changes to its physical, cultural and spiritual character under Israel’s Judaization plan. Settlements were established and expanded, at the expense of land expropriations, dispossessions, home demolitions, the Separation Wall, and other draconian measures to transform the city to an entirely Jewish one. As a result, Palestinian culture and religious heritage are threatened by the establishment of “facts on the ground,” a process begun after the city’s annexation that continues relentlessly to this day.

At the time, official annexation would have caused rupture or confrontation with the international community, because of the city’s symbolic, religious and historic importance. In addition, international laws would have been hard to get around besides ideological differences among Israeli officials. Further, direct annexation would have forced the government to make all city inhabitants citizens, contrary to the plan to Judaize the entire city

On the Six Day War’s final day, Israeli leaders ordered the demolition of the Old City’s Moroccan Quarter, allowing for easier access to the Western Wall. It left 650 residents homeless, many others killed, two mosques destroyed along with other religious and cultural sites, and set the tone for what continued.

Under military occupation, Israel transformed Jerusalem from a multi-cultural, multi-religious city into a predominantly Jewish one under exclusive Israeli control toward the final goal of making the entire city exclusively Jewish – meaning Arabs had to go, voluntarily, by dispossessions, or other means.

Thereafter, Israel manipulated city demographics in its favor toward establishing a Greater Jerusalem by reinforced municipal boundaries – separating Jerusalem from the West Bank by land seizures, dispossessions, home demolitions, the Separation Wall, and a matrix of restrictions over Palestinian residents in the Old City as well as 64 additional square kilometers from surrounding West Bank areas, affecting 28 villages inside the new municipal boundary. As a result, the demographic balance shifted markedly to one predominantly Jewish.

On July 30, 1980, the Knesset introduced the Jerusalem Law, officially annexing the city as Israel’s unified capital – a ceremonial move as East Jerusalem residents were already under military occupation rule.

Yet on March 1, 1980, UN Security Council Resolution 465 declared that:

“all measures taken by Israel to change the physical character, demographic composition, institutional structure or status of the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem, or any part thereof, have no legal validity and that Israel’s policy and practices of settling parts of its population and new immigrants in those territories constitute a flagrant (Fourth Geneva) violation….and also constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East.”

On July 9, 2004, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that “Israeli settlements in the Occupied Territory, including East Jerusalem, are illegal and an obstacle to peace and to economic and social development (and) have been established in breach of international law.”

Throughout its history, Israel routinely defied all UN resolutions and court rulings against its interests, knowing it can get away with it, always with Washington’s backing. Instead, it’s intensified efforts to annex East Jerusalem through continued settlement expansions on expropriated land. For the West Bank, E. Jerusalem and Golan combined, they’re home for a 500,000 Jewish population, growing at around 4 – 6% yearly.

Extremist groups spearhead it, supported generously by Washington, the Jewish diaspora, and others, contributing billions of dollars annually for Israeli occupation, militarism, and settlement expansions.

Through 2009, settlements covered over one-third of East Jerusalem land, and another 30% is designated as “unplanned area” where little or no development is allowed.

In 2009, OCHA reported that Palestinian construction is allowed only in 13% of East Jerusalem, provided required permits are issued. Because of the bureaucratic nightmare getting them, a huge housing shortage exists, exacerbated by regular home demolitions to provide more space for Jews.

Religious, cultural and archeological sites aren’t spared either to accommodate them, Silwan a notable example. Occupied in 1967, Judaizing followed to change its religious and demographic character, an initiative promoted by ELAD (the Hebrew acronym for the City of David), a Jewish organization wanting full control of the area, using extremist measures to achieve it, including excavations destroying priceless antiquities.

Ones below the Al-Aqsa Mosque continue. Others also to control the town through more land ownership, Palestinian dispossessions, and destruction of Islamic and Christian heritage sites.

In 2004, 88 Al Bustan neighborhood homes were demolished to create King’s Garden, an archeological park located where King David established his kingdom.

Islamic cemetery excavations also aroused anger, including converting Bab al-Rahmad into recreational biblical gardens. So far, the cemetery has lost 1,800 square meters on which new burials are prohibited, a portion already converted into a park.

Ma’man Allah Cemetery is Jerusalem’s largest, reputed to hold the remains of important Islamic figures, including Companions of Prophet Muhammad and Muslim intellects and soldiers who fought the Crusaders.

Yet Israel intends a Museum of Tolerance there, turning it into a large excavation site, over 300 skeletons removed, contrary to international law. According to the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, they were desecrated – dumped into a single mass grave.

Worse still may await the Al-Aqsa Mosque because of excavations under and around it, weakening its foundation, threatening its existence. In 2007, Israel began excavating a pathway from the Western Wall to the compound, sparking Muslim outrage.

The Al-Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the Rock Restoration Committee, established in 1956 to restore it and other Jerusalem holy sites, warned that further excavations would imperil the structural integrity, most seriously by the western tunnel (one of 60) near the Mosque.

Deputy Committee head, Ra’if Najm also said chemicals used to break up rocks are causing more damage. As a result, the Security Council and UNESCO demanded that Israel comply with international law, halting further excavations and related operations. Israel didn’t respond.

Other excavations in the Old City and Silwan have also been damaging, Adnan Al-Hussaini, special PA adviser on Jerusalem Affairs warning that Israel is destroying Islamic antiquities, “replacing them with other ones.”

PA legislator Hatem Abdul Qader threatened an International Court of Justice (ICJ) lawsuit to stop the looting. In early 2009, an Umayyad-era artifact was stolen, an ancient stone, transferred to the Knesset’s courtyard, Israel blocking demands to return it.

The Separation Wall, checkpoints, and other restrictions have also been devastating, impeding Palestinian access to, in and around Jerusalem. Yet prohibiting them from worshipping at Al-Aqsa and nearby mosques violates Fourth Geneva, Christians wanting access to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and other religious sites also affected.

The extremist Netanyahu government exacerbates the problem, Palestine’s Chief Justice, Sheikh Tayseer Rajab Al-Tamimi, expressing deep concern about outlandish racist policies threatening “to cancel Arab identity.”

On March 28, 2010, the Kuwait News Agency (KUNA) reported that he urged Palestinians “to exert more efforts and unite in order to protect the holy Al-Aqsa Mosque (by) defy(ing Jewish extremists) attempts to storm the holy shrine,” adding that Judaizing has been ongoing since 1967, in calling for efforts to stop it.

PA Authority under Fatah

Shortly after assuming office, Abdul Qader, PA Minister for Jerusalem, resigned in protest, saying inadequate funding defends Palestinian interests in the city – for law suits, against land confiscations, home demolitions, Israeli security force and settler violence, and the destruction of the city’s religious, historical, cultural and demographic character.

Final Comments

Throughout 43 years of colonization, displacement, land seizures, and East Jerusalem annexation, Judaization continues relentlessly to establish irreversible “facts on the ground (to) cancel Arab identity” by making the entire city exclusively Jewish along with the West Bank’s most valued areas.

MEM supports efforts to stop it and demands accountability. “The Israeli authorities and settlers who impede the civil liberties of the rightful Palestinian owners should be brought (before) an open and fair court of law,” to halt Israeli lawlessness, ensure holy, historic Muslim sites are protected, preserved and restored, and to defend their right to a sovereign state, East Jerusalem its capital, or a one-state solution for all.

Israel will react violently, viciously, and illegally against it, its customary behavior as a rapacious occupier, defying the rule of law in pursuit of a Greater Israel and regional dominance, partnered with Washington in its global imperial agenda, threatening all humanity unless stopped.

  • Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening. http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Blockade ‘eased’ as Gaza starves more slowly

Gaza Children (Tales to Tell - 2009)

Jonathan Cook, 25 June 2010

As Israel this week declared the ‘easing’ of the four-year blockade of Gaza, an official explained the new guiding principle: ‘Civilian goods for civilian people.’ The severe and apparently arbitrary restrictions on foodstuffs entering the enclave – coriander bad, cinnamon good – will finally end, we are told. Gaza’s 1.5 million inhabitants will have all the coriander they want.

This “adjustment”, as the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu termed it, is aimed solely at damage limitation. With Israel responsible for killing nine civilians aboard a Gaza-bound aid flotilla three weeks ago, the world has finally begun to wonder what purpose the siege serves. Did those nine really need to die to stop coriander, chocolate and children’s toys from reaching Gaza? And, as Israel awaits other flotillas, will more need to be executed to enforce the policy?

Faced with this unwelcome scrutiny, Israel – as well as the United States and the European states that have been complicit in the siege – desperately wants to deflect attention away from demands for the blockade to be lifted entirely. Instead it prefers to argue that the more liberal blockade for Gaza will distinguish effectively between a necessary “security” measures and an unfair “civilian” blockade. Israel has cast itself as the surgeon who, faced with Siamese twins, is mastering the miraculous operation needed to decouple them.

The result, Mr Netanyahu told his cabinet, would be a “tightening of the security blockade because we have taken away Hamas’ ability to blame Israel for harming the civilian population”. Listen to Israeli officials and it sounds as if thousands of “civilian” items are ready to pour into Gaza. No Qassam rockets for Hamas but soon, if we are to believe them, Gaza’s shops will be as well-stocked as your average Wal-Mart.

Be sure, it won’t happen.

Even if many items are no longer banned, they still have to find their way into the enclave. Israel controls the crossing points and determines how many trucks are allowed in daily. Currently, only a quarter of the number once permitted are able to deliver their cargo, and that is unlikely to change to any significant degree. Moreover, as part of the “security” blockade, the ban is expected to remain on items such as cement and steel desperately needed to build and repair the thousands of homes devastated by Israel’s attack 18 months ago.

In any case, until Gaza’s borders, port and airspace are its own, its factories are rebuilt, and exports are again possible, the hobbled economy has no hope of recovering. For the overwhelming majority of Palestinians in Gaza, mired in poverty, the new list of permissible items – including coriander – will remain nothing more than an aspiration.

But more importantly for Israel, by concentrating our attention on the supposed ending of the “civilian” blockade, Israel hopes we will forget to ask a more pertinent question: what is the purpose of this refashioned “security” blockade?

Over the years Israelis have variously been told that the blockade was imposed to isolate Gaza’s “terrorist” rulers, Hamas; to serve as leverage to stop rocket attacks on nearby Israeli communities; to prevent arms smuggling into Gaza; and to force the return of the captured soldier Gilad Shalit.

None of the reasons stands up to minimal scrutiny. Hamas is more powerful than ever; the rocket attacks all but ceased long ago; arms smugglers use the plentiful tunnels under the Egyptian border, not Erez or Karni crossings; and Sgt Shalit would already be home had Israel seriously wanted to trade him for an end to the siege.

The real goal of the blockade was set out in blunt fashion at its inception, in early 2006, shortly after Hamas won the Palestinian elections. Dov Weisglass, the government’s chief adviser at the time, said it would put Palestinians in Gaza “on a diet, but not make them die of hunger”. Aid agencies can testify to the rampant malnutrition that followed. The ultimate aim, Mr Weisglass admitted, was to punish ordinary Gazans in the hope that they would overthrow Hamas.

Is Mr Weisglass a relic of the pre-Netanyahu era, his blockade-as-diet long ago superseded? Not a bit. Only last month, during a court case against the siege, Mr Netanyahu’s government justified the policy not as a security measure but as “economic warfare” against Gaza. One document even set out the minimum calories – or “red lines”, as they were also referred to – needed by Gazans according to their age and sex.

In truth, Israel’s “security” blockade is, in both its old and new incarnations, every bit a “civilian” blockade. It was designed and continues to be “collective punishment” of the people of Gaza for electing the wrong rulers. Helpfully, international law defines the status of Israel’s policy: it is a crime against humanity.

Easing the siege so that Gaza starves more slowly may be better than nothing. But breaking 1.5 million Palestinians out of the prison Israel has built for them is the real duty of the international community.

  • Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. His latest books are “Israel and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East” (Pluto Press) and “Disappearing Palestine: Israel’s Experiments in Human Despair” (Zed Books). His website is www.jkcook.net.

Gaza Commitments Yet Unfulfilled

Gisha Logo

Gisa, 24 June 2010

On Sunday, Israel’s Cabinet issued an encouraging statement promising to remove many of the restrictions on civilian goods entering Gaza, including those needed for economic activity.

What has changed on the ground since the announcement and more generally, since international pressure mounted on Israel in the wake of the May 31 flotilla incident? The list of consumer goods permitted into Gaza has been expanded to include previously banned items such as ketchup, mayonnaise, and children’s toys. Ah, yes, and chips (french fries) as well, for dipping into the ketchup. But that’s about it.

We are therefore puzzled by Prime Minister Netanyahu’s statement that “we are already seeing a significant growth in the scope of the civilian goods entering Gaza.” There has been no significant change in the volume of trucks entering Gaza, as is evident from Gaza Gateway’s graphs. Last week, for example, 654 trucks entered Gaza, including via the grain elevator, similar to the number that entered in the week before the flotilla incident (662). This week, as of yesterday, the fourth of five working days for the crossings, approximately 567 trucks had entered Gaza, which is consistent with the policy, since June 2007, to allow entry of approximately 25% of what Gaza residents need.

Indeed, it is hard to see how more goods could enter Gaza, given that the one crossing still operating – Kerem Shalom (Kerem Abu Salam) – is working at near capacity with an average of 110 trucks per day of goods, five days per week. The “significant growth” mentioned by Mr. Netanyahu would be difficult unless Israel opens some of the crossings it has sealed over the last three years, including Karni Crossing, Gaza’s commercial lifeline, with a capacity of 1,000 trucks per day.

In any event, as Dan Ephron notes in Newsweek today, without the ability to export finished products and receive raw materials (they are still not being allowed in), economic recovery in Gaza will remain elusive.

Tony Blair says yes to Israeli obsession with control + supervision

Gaza Bread Crisis (Photo: Sameh Habeeb Jan 2009)

Marian Houk, 22 June 2010

If anyone failed to understand the ever-so-careful language in the Quartet statement issued on Monday [following the Israeli cabinet pronouncements on Sunday] Tony Blair spelled it out perfectly clearly in an interview published in part on Tuesday [the rest is promised for later in the week] with the Jerusalem Post’s David Horovitz and Herb Keinon.

Gaza Bread Crisis (Photo: Sameh Habeeb Jan 2009)

Gaza Bread Crisis (Photo: Sameh Habeeb Jan 2009)

First, a re-cap of a particularly relevant portion of the Quartet statement issued yesterday: The Quartet said it “recognizes that Israel has legitimate security concerns that must continue to be safeguarded, and believes efforts to maintain security while enabling movement and access for Palestinian people and goods are critical. The Quartet commits to work with Israel and the international community to prevent the illicit trafficking of arms and ammunition into Gaza. It urges all those wishing to deliver goods to do so through established channels so that their cargo can be inspected and transferred via land crossings into Gaza. The Quartet emphasizes that there is no need for unnecessary confrontations and calls on all parties to act responsibly in meeting the needs of the people of Gaza”.

Now, here is what the Jerusalem Post reported after speaking to Tony Blair:

“Anyone thinking of organizing an aid flotilla for Gaza should instead utilize the legitimate existing land crossings, where Israel is now lifting restrictions on civilian goods, Quartet envoy Tony Blair said on Monday. ‘If we implement this policy so that the things that people are trying to bring in by flotilla you can bring in through the legitimate existing crossings, do it that way’, Blair urged in an interview with The Jerusalem Post. ‘That is the more sensible way to do that’ … Blair, who played a central role in working with the government to reverse the three-year policy of restricting civilian goods entering Gaza, emphatically endorsed the Israeli security concerns that underpin the ongoing naval blockade. ‘Where I divide from some others in the international community is that I think that Israel has got a genuine security concern that it is entitled to meet’, said the former British prime minister. ‘For me, the fact that Israel says, ‘Look, we’re not going to allow things into the [Gaza] seaport, but you can bring them to Ashdod, and we can check them, and then they can come on to Gaza,’ I think that is a reasonable position. What you can’t justify is saying that basic foodstuffs and household items can’t go into Gaza … My argument was and always has been that there is a very clear distinction, the only distinction in the end you can sensibly justify, between the security needs of Israel and [the] daily life [needs of Gazans]‘ … Blair said he would now be exploring the possibility of bringing PA forces to help oversee land crossings into Gaza, and restoring the EU’s role at the Rafah crossing. “Improving the conditions of people in Gaza by whatever means is helpful to the overall cause,” he said … (The full interview with Tony Blair will appear in the Post later this week.)” This is reported in the JPost here.

By the way, what does he mean by “the overall cause” ???

And, could somebody please explain how, and on what grounds — given that it continues to insist, in defiance of all evidence the contrary, to that Gaza is no longer Israeli-occupied — Israel can justify its insistence on maintaining absolute ultimate control over everything that goes in and out of the Gaza Strip [except, of course, via the tunnels -- a policy, also by the way, that some Palestinians predict, will be coming soon in the West Bank, too]?

Or, is this just a far worse form of occupation — in which many others [starting with the Quartet] are also collaborating?

And one other question: would Tony Blair speak in the same tongue to a Palestinian publication?

Source:UN-Turth

Limited Israeli Easing of Gaza Blockade Greeted with Dismay

Juan Cole

Juan Cole, 19 June 2010

Despite the breathless flurry of approving statements provoked by the English-language pledge issued by the prime minister of Israel, Binyamin Netanyahu that the blockade of Gaza would be ‘eased,’ in fact , Haaretz reports, the Hebrew text of the communique does not indicate that the cabinet made any such decision, and there has been no change at the border checkpoint.

Even if Israel were actually doing what the English text indicated, the Palestinians, the United Nations and aid NGOs do not see the measure as going nearly far enough. PLO spokesman Saeb Erekat dismissed the announced easing as an effort

‘”to make it appear that it has eased its four-year blockade . . . In reality, the siege of the Gaza Strip, illegally imposed on Palestinians, continues unabated. Israel has a so-called ‘white list’ of only 114 items. Palestinian basic needs require at least 8,000 items that continue to be prohibited. These include essential materials for rebuilding and for waste-water treatment.” ‘

For one thing, how many items are let in is less important than the volume of each. The Irish Times quotes Robert Serry, the head of the Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). During the first week in June, imports declined by a quarter, even though Israel expanded the list of allowed imports by 11 food and health items. OCHA says that the amount of staples and aid going into Gaza is only about 17% of the goods routinely allowed in before the blockade began. So an ‘easing’ would not even restore the status quo ante of pre-2007.

Although in public and in English Israeli spokesmen stress that the purpose of the blockade is to keep arms out of the hands of Hamas, the fundamentalist party-militia that dominates Gaza, in fact an internal document ferreted out by McClatchy demonstrates that the blockade has all along mainly aimed at punishing innocent civilians. If you think about it, the idea that Hamas can form a conventional challenge to Israel, using e.g. tanks, is ridiculous.

Professor Ian Lustick argues that Israel should just take that truce Hamas is always offering, just as Egypt and Jordan have done with their versions of Hamas– and stop trying to pretend that Israel isn’t in the Middle East or that it can change the Middle East all around at will.

The Irish Times quotes Sami Abu Zuhri, a spokesman for Hamas, to the effect that “What is needed is a complete lifting of the blockade. Goods and people must be free to enter and leave. Gaza especially needs construction material, which must be allowed to come in without restrictions.” He called lifting the bans on chocolates and potato chips “frivolous.”

Christopher Gunness, spokesman of the UN Relief and Works Agency, which cares for Palestinian refugees, said: “We look at deeds not words. There is a massive amount of rebuilding to do in Gaza. Four thousand homes were destroyed, another 17,000 damaged during the [ 2008-09] war. The agency needs to repair its schools and build 100 new schools for 39,000 children.

Aljazeera English reports on the reaction of Gaza’s government. It also points out that there would be no chocolate in the Palestinian Gaza Strip if it weren’t for smuggling through tunnels. And even children’s toys had been banned, officially making the Israelis the Grinches of the Middle East.



Letting children have toys is hardly a big step toward ending the siege. If the Israelis really do, as they pledged in English, allow cement and steel in, that would at least allow the 8% of Palestinians whose homes were destroyed by the Israeli military in winter 2008-2009 to rebuild. But the main problem is with any sort of blockade of goods other than guns and explosives. The blockade kills employment and investment, guaranteeing malnutrition in children. In famines, people do not starve because there is no food. They starve because they cannot afford to buy food suddenly become expensive. Likewise, the 10% of Palestinian children in Gaza who have experienced stunted growth are just in families where the breadwinner has been unemployed for a long time and in which relief aid doesn’t quite go far enough. “Easing” the blockade will have no effect on employment, which is very low, perhaps 40%, and therefore will not address the most pressing problem.

An Italian humanitarian familiar with Gaza makes the same point at Russia Today:



Source : http://www.juancole.com/2010/06/limited-israeli-easing-of-gaza-blockade-greeted-with-dismay.html

Easing Gaza’s Siege: Bogus and Unacceptable

Eretz Checkpoint between Gaza and Israel

Stephen Lendman, 19 June 2010

On June 17, Haaretz writer Barak Ravid and Reuters headlined, “Israel to ease Gaza land blockade,” saying:

“Israel’s security cabinet voted Thursday to ease its land blockade of the Gaza Strip, following its deadly raid on a humanitarian aid flotilla bound for the (mischaracterized) Hamas-ruled territory,” in fact, its legitimate government.

An official statement said:

“The Security Cabinet conducted an extensive discussion over the last two days regarding adjustments in Israel’s Gaza policy.

It was agreed to:

– Liberalize the system by which civilian goods enter Gaza.

– Expand the inflow of materials for civilian projects that are under international supervision.

– Continue existing security procedures to prevent the inflow of weapons and war materiel.

– the Cabinet will decide in the coming days on additional steps to implement this policy.

– Israel expects the international community to work toward the immediate release of Gilad Shalit,” the captured Israeli soldier on June 25, 2006 near the Kerem Shalom crossing, southeast of Rafah – one soldier compared to thousands of Palestinian civilians, held illegally in Israeli prisons under horrific conditions, including torture and other forms of abuse.

According to Raed Fattouh, Palestinian supplies coordinator for the Territory, the approved list will include all food items, toys, stationery, kitchen utensils, mattresses and towels, excluding most of what Gaza needs, including construction materials to rebuild.

For example, cement will still be banned, Israel saying Hamas could use it to build military infrastructure. Also, Israel’s official statement was vague, saying implementation procedures will follow, emphasizing that “existing security procedures” will continue – showing the announcement was a sham PR gesture to diffuse worldwide anger and satisfy world leaders, short of fully opening Gaza’s land and sea borders for free in and out movement of people and goods. Nothing less can be accepted.

Yet Israel’s ruse may have worked.

AFP quoted EU diplomat, Catherine Ashton, welcoming the decision, saying:

“We’re looking with great interest to what the Israeli cabinet has said this morning,” adding that she hopes “many more goods” will follow and stands ready to support Israel with a mission on the ground.

Middle East envoy, Tony Blair, called it an “important step….Israel has the clear right to defend itself and protect its security. The best way to do this is to ensure that weapons cannot reach Gaza whilst allowing into Gaza the items of ordinary daily life.”

French Foreign Minister, Bernard Kouchner (he, Blair and other EU officials reliably staunch Israeli allies) said: “It is the first major progress since the crisis began. But it is not enough.”

The White House called it a “step in the right direction,” and State Department spokesman, Mark Toner, said the Obama administration supports an “expansion of the scope and types of goods into Gaza….while addressing, obviously, Israel’s legitimate security needs” – showing Washington only backs Israel’s bogus gesture, and continues, like Tel Aviv, calling Hamas a terrorist organization, when, in fact, it’s Palestine’s legitimately elected government.

Palestinian Response to the Sham

Hamas spokesman, Sami Abu Zuhri, told Reuters:

“What is needed is a complete lifting of the blockade. Goods and people must be free to enter and leave. Gaza especially needs construction material(s), which must be allowed to come in without restrictions.”

Senior Hamas leaders rejected the plan, Ismail Radwan, calling it a thinly veiled attempt to “relieve the pressure. We in Hamas reject the Zionist decision, which is an attempt to obscure the international decision to completely lift the siege.”

Fatah chief negotiator, Saeb Erakat, called it a “public relations ploy,” saying Mahmoud Abbas “demands the complete lifting of the siege….He believes there are no partial solutions.” He also wants it on his terms under his authority as chief Israeli enforcer. Otherwise, he opposes lifting, following orders from Tel Aviv and Washington.

Sari Bashi, director of the Gisha Legal Center for Freedom of Movement said:

“The restrictions on goods into and out of Gaza are instituted not for security reasons, but rather as part of a declared policy to restrict the movement of people and goods as a means of applying pressure on the Hamas regime. The express purpose….is to block all economic activity in Gaza. So the real question is whether Israel will abandon this policy – immediately or in the near future – or whether it will continue to aspire to block economic activity, but simply let in a few more consumer goods.”

In a June 17 press release, Gisha headlined, “We don’t need more lists, we need to end ‘economic warfare,’ ” saying:

“The time has come for Israel to ask serious questions about how three years of closure (have) affect(ed)….1.5 million people whose right to travel and to engage in productive work have been denied. We don’t need cosmetic changes.”

What’s needed is unconditional free in and out movement, and world community censure of Israeli policy, economic warfare, and its ploy about fearing weapons imports and other security concerns. Under international law, Israel, as an occupying power, is responsible for the population’s welfare, including the free passage of food, medical supplies, clothing, and other essential items.

Even after rejecting Gaza’s occupation status, Israel’s High Court ruled that its government bears responsibility for the welfare of its people – because of continuing conflict, its military control of border crossings, and the Strip’s dependence on Israeli goods and services like fuel and electricity. No longer are half measures acceptable or Israel’s bogus justifications.

In addition, an independent investigation of Israel’s premeditated Freedom Flotilla attack is essential. No longer can its international law violations be tolerated, including repeated crimes against peace, the most serious of all.

Israel must be held accountable, the view Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) President, Mevlut Cavusoglu, expressed in a June 13 Today’s Zaman interview, explaining that Israel had violated core human rights principles embraced by the organization, saying they’d be consequences at the end of June summer session, adding:

“The Council of Europe and its Parliamentary Assembly value the rule of law, human rights and democracy. Israel was committed to these values (as seen) by signing up to be an observing member. But, with this raid in open waters, it violated a number of values espoused by this body.”

“This crisis with Israel will hamper our efforts in our Partnership for Democracy project and curtail efforts at dialogue in the Subcommittee on the Middle East. (The) attack came as a shock to us. We had to respond. Both the term president, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and I issued statements condemning this attack in international waters.”

In its June 21 – 25 session, PACE will address the attack, its Political Affairs Committee already planning an emergency summer meeting, a report to follow, Cavusoglu adding that:

“This is not a problem between Israel and Turkey. There were citizens in the aid flotilla from over 30 countries and ships flying the flags of many countries. It also happened in open waters, and civilians got killed. This was an act of piracy and violated international law.”

Update on New Flotillas

On June 17, the International Middle East Media Center (IMEMC) headlined, “Aid Ship Sets Sail From Iran Bound for Gaza,” saying:

An International Red Crescent Society organized Iranian Flotilla, funded by private donors, “departed from Iran bound for Gaza, with another ship planning to join it by the weekend.”

Last year during Cast Lead, another Iranian ship tried to enter Gaza, “but was turned back (not attacked) by the Israeli military while still in international waters.” The IDF, however, “threatened to engage (this) ship” while still in international waters, yet an attack seems unlikely given the world outrage over the May 31 one.

Washington’s response was unsurprising, State Department spokesman, PJ Crowley, saying America is very concerned about Iranian ships as Israel earlier “intercepted (some) that were carrying, you know, weapons and armaments that have been used to threaten the Israeli people,” even though no evidence supports the accusation.

The “Israeli government has (never) presented a case in which it captured ships with weapons bound for Gaza,” these accusations, like others, exposed as lies.

On June 8, Law Professor Jonathan Turley revealed fake Israeli video showing a cash of heavy weapons on the Mavi Marmara as justifiable evidence for the attack. Supposedly found were mortars, artillery shells, bazookas, and a million euros intended for Hamas. It was bogus, Israeli propaganda, but was “widely distributed as (proof) of why the IDF Naval commandos were dispatched to intercept the six vessels including the M/S Mavi Marmara.”

The Flotilla carried no weapons, not even light arms, the entire cargo comprised of food, medicines, toys, educational materials, and other essential items. Turley referred to “a conscious misinformation campaign,” those circulating the video knowing it was fake.

Like past aid vessels, the Iranian ones are carrying humanitarian aid, no weapons of any kind, verified by inspections before departure. “Passengers and crew say that any attempts by the Israeli government to claim (otherwise) would be a complete fabrication.”

On June 17, Sifynews.com headlined, “More international flotillas headed for Gaza Strip,” saying:

“Ships from several countries, including Iran and Lebanon, have reportedly left or are planning to leave (for) Gaza in defiance of an Israeli maritime blockade on that territory” – a land one as well not mentioned.

Sifynews reported several Iranian ships are involved and two Lebanese ones:

– the Naj Al Ali, sponsored by Journalists without Borders and Free Palestine “with at least 50 journalists and 25 European volunteers on board, including European parliament members;” and

– “an all-women’s ship, the Mariam.”

In addition, many others are planned from a number of countries, including more from the Turkish based Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Aid (IHH), bogusly called an extremist Islamic terrorist organization, when, in fact, it provides humanitarian aid “to spread justice and good….fight(s) violation(s) of anyone’s basic liberties and human rights (and) perpetuat(es) good anytime and anywhere.”

According to the IrishTimes.com on June 16, IHH “told members of the European Parliament it had assembled (another) six ships for the next flotilla and put out an appeal for others to join.” It plans to sail the second half of July, and invited the international media to inspect all goods to “demonstrate their commitment to total transparency.”

Richard Howlitt, a British European Parliament MP, organized the group’s Strasbourg press conference, saying the EU is obligated to ensure safe passage and respect for humanitarian law next time, then adding:

“If this terrible tragedy tips the balance so that the international community finally insists on full and unhindered humanitarian access to Gaza, then some good can still come of it,” he said, referring to the Mavi Marmara massacre.

These and other flotillas will maintain pressure until the siege is entirely lifted, partial measures no longer will be tolerated, nor should they ever be.

A Final Comment

On June 17, Ma’an News Agency headlined “Fatah: Israel plans to separate West Bank from Gaza,” saying:

“Fatah said Israel aims at cutting off the Gaza Strip from the West Bank and ‘end the Palestinian national project,” according to party spokesman Ahmad Assaf. Whether or not Abbas goes along is unclear. What is clear is that he’s no friend of beleaguered Palestinians.

Neither is Congress, several prominent members (including Charles Rangel, Anthony Weiner, Carolyn Maloney, Jerry Nadler, Eliot Engel, and Janis Shorenstein), asking the State Department to prohibit all Flotilla members from entering America, wanting them investigated for terrorist ties.

Media Matters’ senior foreign policy fellow, MJ Rosenberg, cites Washington officials wanting Turkey kicked out of NATO, saying:

“The government, the (Israeli) lobby, the neocons, and their acolytes in the media, have decided that Turkey needs to be punished for its opposition to the Gaza blockade and its role in the flotilla ‘fiasco.’ ”

“The word is going out. Turkey is no friend of Israel, no friend of Jews, and has become, yes, a Muslim state that cares about its fellow Muslims in Gaza,” – again saying “Rep. Anthony Weiner takes the prize” for displaying extreme hostility, then adding:

“Anyone who questions just how far the lobby will go in defense of the Netanyahu government’s policies has their answer.”

Nor is there any doubt how closely aligned the Obama administration is with Israel, public statements about a rift misguided and out-of-touch, and the same holds for Canada, the point Eves Yngler makes in his book, “Canada and Israel: Building Apartheid.”

Since Israel’s 1948 creation, Canada, like America, has been a loyal ally, not an “honest broker” on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, then or now, and the reason outspoken professors like University of Ottawa’s Denis Rancourt got fired, despite his stature, tenure, and heroic commitment human rights and democratic values, ones neither Canada or America champion, uphold or defend.

No wonder that Prime Minister Stephen Harper called on New Democratic Party (NDP) MP Libby Davies to resign as her party’s deputy leader for saying Israel’s occupation is the longest in the world, then adding: “People are suffering. I’ve been to the West Bank and Gaza twice so I’ve seen for myself what’s going on.”

In response, Harper said:

“Mr. Speaker, this is a fundamental denial of Israel’s right to exist.” That and more from others in parliament, the way US politicians defend the most outrageous Israeli crimes, denouncing their victims as terrorists.

It’s why champions of human rights can’t rest, nor should they ever compromise on right v. wrong issues, especially when it comes to Israel or its Washington paymaster/partner.

  • Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

HRW: Weak Mandate Undermines Flotilla Inquiry

MV Mavi Marmara leaving Antalya for Gaza on May 22, 2010
Gaza Blockade Enters Fourth Year, Continuing Collective Punishment of Civilians

(Jerusalem) – The Israeli government has undermined the credibility of the panel appointed to investigate its military’s deadly interception of the “Gaza aid flotilla” by preventing it from questioning Israeli soldiers or compelling the military to provide evidence, Human Rights Watch said today.  Human Rights Watch reiterated its criticism of Israel’s blockade of Gaza, now entering its fourth year, as a form of collective punishment against the civilian population.

The three-member panel, which the Israeli Cabinet approved on June 14, 2010, is not a full commission of inquiry as set out in Israeli law and cannot subpoena witnesses or officials.  Under its mandate, the panel must instead rely on requests for documents and “summaries of operational investigations” conducted by the Israeli military itself to determine what military personnel did or were ordered to do during the May 31 interdiction of the flotilla. Nine Turkish participants were killed and dozens wounded in the operation.

“Israel claims the panel is independent, but insists that it accept the military’s version of events,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. “Given the Israel’s military poor record of investigating itself in past cases of possible wrongful death, it is hard to have confidence that the panel’s dependence on the Israeli military will lead to the truth.”

The Israeli government empowered the panel to “request” testimony or other evidence from any individual or entity, whether Israeli or foreign, except “in regard to military personnel and personnel from the other security forces.” The panel may not interview soldiers or officers individually, may not see their testimony or statements, and must operate “only” by requesting documents and “summaries” of internal military inquiries, known as operational debriefings, for which soldiers are interviewed by officers in the chain of command who have no training in conducting inquiries into suspected wrongdoing. These debriefings are intended as a lessons-learned tool rather than an investigative mechanism into possible criminal actions. The panel may “request” further inquiries by an internal Israeli military team that is investigating the flotilla incident.

“The Israeli government may have valid reasons for wanting to protect the identity of individual soldiers, but there are many ways it could do that without blocking the panel’s access to those who participated in the incident,” Whitson said.

The panel’s mandate states that it may redact any information from its final report that it feels could compromise national security.

The panel’s Israeli members are Jacob Turkel, a former Supreme Court justice; Shabtai Rosenne, a jurist, and Maj.-Gen. (ret.) Amos Horev, a former president of Israel’s Technion institute and former chairman of the board of the Rafael arms group.

The panel also includes two international “observers,” David Trimble, who won a Nobel peace prize in 1998 for his role in negotiating an end to the conflict in Northern Ireland, and Brig. Gen. Kenneth Watkin, a former Canadian military judge advocate general.  As observers, they may be prevented from seeing evidence that the chairman is substantially certain would significantly harm Israel’s national security or foreign relations, and they cannot vote on the commission’s findings.  On May 31, Trimble helped open a “friends of Israel” initiative, raising questions about the reasons for his selection.

In addition to examining the raid on the flotilla, the panel is mandated to inquire into “the conformity of [Israel's] naval blockade [of Gaza] with the rules of international law.”  Israel’s blockade amounts to collective punishment against the civilian population and violates Israel’s international legal obligations as the occupying power under international humanitarian law, Human Rights Watch said. The blockade has crippled Gaza’s economy and caused immense hardship to 1.5 million residents there.

According to news reports, Israel’s Cabinet may soon consider changes to the blockade policy proposed after negotiations between Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and international Quartet representative Tony Blair.

Israel maintains that it imposed border closures, as well as fuel and electricity cuts, in response to attacks on Israel by Hamas, which violently took over Gaza in 2007 after winning elections in 2006, and other Palestinian armed groups, and the continued detention of an Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, who was captured in June 2006.

Since 2005, Hamas’s armed wing, the al-Qassam Brigades, and other Palestinian armed groups in Gaza, have launched thousands of rockets at Israeli population centers.  These indiscriminate attacks on civilian areas are clear violations of international humanitarian law which Human Rights Watch has repeatedly condemned.

“Israel has every right to address its legitimate security concerns, but it can accomplish that by restricting a narrow list of military-related items rather than an arbitrary, changing, and secretive list of goods that civilians need and that present no conceivable security concern,” Whitson said.

Israel should agree to international efforts to secure the immediate and sustained opening of border crossings for the flow of humanitarian aid as well as people and commercial goods in and out of Gaza, Human Rights Watch said.

Israel, with Egypt’s collaboration, intensified existing restrictions on imports and exports to and from Gaza by completely sealing Gaza’s borders during and after fighting between Hamas and Fatah on June 14 and 15, 2007, in which Hamas gained unilateral control of Gazan territory.  Hamas had defeated Fatah in parliamentary elections in Gaza and the West Bank in January 2006; a power-sharing government collapsed in June 2007. Israel has only partly and temporarily relaxed the closure since then, as Hamas consolidated its internal control of the territory.  Israel allows for the crossing of some goods in an ad-hoc, non-transparent and arbitrary fashion. Fatah has also quietly supported the Israeli and Egyptian blockade as a way to pressure its rival.

The United Nations Security Council, the United States, and the 27 European Union member states have all referred to the blockade as unsustainable. International demands to lift it grew louder after the May 31 flotilla incident.

On June 14, speaking to EU Foreign Ministers, the representative of the international Quartet, Tony Blair, said that Israel should reverse its current punitive policy by “shifting from a list of goods that are permitted into Gaza to a list of goods that are prohibited from entering, such as weapons and combat material.” The EU’s 27 foreign ministers subsequently pledged to “contribute to the implementation” of such a mechanism.”

Although Israel removed its forces and settlements from Gaza in 2005, it almost fully controls Gaza’s land and sea borders, airspace, and population registry, making it an occupying power under international law, Human Rights Watch said. The blockade violates Israel’s obligations under international humanitarian law governing military occupation to ensure the safety and well-being of Gaza’s civilian population and to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid by others.  Egypt formally relaxed its restrictions on the movement of people through Gaza’s southern border after May 31.

Israel’s restrictions on imports of food, fuel, and other essential goods, as well as on virtually all agricultural and industrial exports, have devastated Gaza’s economy.  Some goods enter Gaza through Hamas-controlled tunnels along the border with Egypt, but most residents cannot afford them.  With Gaza’s economy strangled by the blockade, approximately 80 percent of Gaza’s population of 1.5 million people receive food aid.  Even as border closures increased Gaza’s dependency on humanitarian aid, Israel further restricted that aid. Israel allowed an average of 2,807 weekly truckloads of goods into Gaza during the first months of 2007, before imposing the blockade, but only 488 weekly truckloads entered in late May 2010.

Israel has also limited the self-sufficiency of Gazans by restricting their access to farmland and fisheries.  Ostensibly to deter attacks by armed groups, Israel restricts Palestinian access to largely agricultural lands that lie near the Gaza-Israel border and comprise more than 18 percent of Gaza’s territory by firing upon Palestinians who enter the area.   In January 2009, Israel reduced the area in which Gaza fishermen can fish from six to three nautical miles from Gaza’s coastline. Prior to 2000, Gazans were permitted to fish up to 12 nautical miles from the coast. The number of fishermen in Gaza has decreased from 10,000 to 3,400 over the last 10 years, according to the UN. Israel has stated that the naval blockade is intended to prevent arms smuggling by sea.

Until now, Israel has rejected proposals to facilitate delivery of desperately needed assistance to Gaza.  There had been extensive destruction and damage to Gaza homes, schools, and infrastructure during Israel’s large-scale military operations launched, according to the Israeli government, to suppress rocket fire by Hamas and other groups into Israel. In late May 2009, the UN presented a proposal to complete US$80 million worth of housing, health, and education projects that had been stalled for two years due to the blockade.  The proposal would have allowed Israeli authorities to extensively monitor imported materials, including vetting construction contractors and storage sites for the materials, as well as periodically photographing construction sites; Israel rejected the proposal.  After nine months of negotiations, Israel approved only a few UN projects, including recently the completion of 151 housing units.

Prime Minister Netanyahu stated on May 31 that Israel restricted only weapons and so-called dual-use items that could be used for military reasons by Palestinian armed groups.  In fact, Israel continues to ban imports of items ranging from mammogram machines to fishing rods to foodstuffs, and to ban all exports apart from sporadic shipments of cut flowers and strawberries.

On June 25, 2006, a Palestinian armed group, including Hamas fighters, captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, who remains in detention.  Israel has cited Shalit’s detention as well as Hamas’s refusal to recognize Israel and to renounce violence as justifications for the blockade. Those who have willfully conducted or ordered deliberate or indiscriminate rocket attacks on Israeli civilians are responsible for war crimes, Human Rights Watch said. And Hamas’s prolonged incommunicado detention of Staff Sergeant Shalit is cruel and inhumane and may amount to torture under international law. Shalit is unable to communicate with his family or to receive visits from the International Committee of the Red Cross. However, violations of the laws of war by one side to an armed conflict do not legitimate violations by the other, Human Rights Watch said.

Hamas officials refused Human Rights Watch’s request to visit Shalit and check on his conditions of confinement during a meeting in Gaza in May, saying that they would not take the risk that his location could be discovered, even though Human Rights Watch had offered to travel to the site blindfolded and to accept any other security precautions that Hamas wanted. Human Rights Watch has repeatedly condemned Shalit’s prolonged incommunicado detention.

“It is vital for the international community to commit to a comprehensive monitoring and control regime that will enable the free flow of goods and people in and out of Gaza based on a narrow list of specific prohibited goods,” Whitson said.

While Israel is entitled to inspect goods going into Gaza, any restrictions should be for specific security reasons and not to block humanitarian aid or ordinary commercial transactions, Human Rights Watch said. Overly broad restrictions on basic goods violate international humanitarian law, which restricts a government with effective control over a territory from blocking goods that are essential to the survival of the civilian population.

Source: http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2010/06/16/israelgaza-weak-mandate-undermines-flotilla-inquiry

Three Years of Gaza Closure – By the Numbers

Gisha Logo
June 2007-June 2010: The Gaza Strip border crossings are closed; Restrictions on the passage of goods and people

  • The closure of the Gaza Strip applies to a coastal strip 360 km² in area (139 mi²).
Gaza is just over twice the size of Washington, DC. Gaza is about the same size as Seattle and Philadelphia and one-third the size of New York City. Israel is 22,072 km² – Gaza could fit into Israel more than 61 times!

Paralyzed economy Israel allows in only items defined as basic products “essential to the survival of the civilian population”.

  • The number of types of items Israel allows into the Gaza Strip: 114. Before the closure: more than 4000 individual items.
A large Israeli supermarket carries 10,000-15,000 items.
  • Among the items whose passage Israel forbids: vinegar, children’s toys, cocoa, chewing gum, paper and musical instruments.
  • Truckloads of goods entering Gaza: an average of around 2,300 per month. Before the closure: 10,400 per month (truckloads now entering Gaza thus equals about 25% of pre-closure total).
30,000 trucks enter Manhattan each day (population of almost 1.6 million people).
  • Israel prevents the transfer of raw materials for industry as part of its “economic warfare” policy designed to prevent economic activity in Gaza as a means of pressure: it forbids the transfer to Gaza of large blocks of margarine intended for industrial usage yet allows in small packages of margarine for household consumption; it bans the transfer of rubber, glue and nylon which are used in the production of diapers in the Strip, yet allows the transfer of diapers produced in Israel; and it prevents the transfer of industrial salt, glucose and plastic containers used to produce tahini paste but allows in Israeli-made tahini paste. According to estimates by the Palestinian Federation of Industries, more than 90% of Gaza’s factories belonging to the Federation are closed or working at minimum capacity.
  • Export: since the closure (June 2007-today): 259 trucks have left Gaza; before the closure: an average of 70 trucks per day left Gaza (2005). In three years, Israel has permitted exports totaling less than what used to be exported in four days.
The Israeli food company Tnuva sends out 400 trucks per day from its factory to destinations all over Israel.
  • Cooking gas: an average of 2,500 tons per month transferred to Gaza. The demand: 6,000 tons per month.
  • Unemployment: 33.9% in the first quarter of 2010.
  • Actual participation in the workforce: 36.3% (304,900 people). 65% of the population live below the poverty line.
  • Supported by international aid organizations: 80% of the population.

People obstructed Israel allows the passage of people into and out of Gaza only “in humanitarian and exceptional cases”.

  • The Rafah Crossing: closed since June 2007 except for occasional and limited openings that meet 8% of the needs of the residents of the Gaza Strip. In 2010 thus far, an average of 3,192 people passed through the crossing monthly. Before the closure: an average of about 40,000 people traveled through the crossing.
An average of 910,000 people transit through Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport each month. An average of 125,000 people cross through the Allenby Bridge Crossing (between Israel and Jordan) every month.
  • Not humanitarian according to Israel: A visit by a woman living in the West Bank to her husband in the Gaza Strip; children visiting their father in the Gaza Strip; a son from Gaza visiting his dying mother in Jordan (“family ties in themselves do not constitute sufficient humanitarian justification for travel”); students going to study in the West Bank and abroad; travel by merchants for the purposes of trade; travel for training and more.

Decaying infrastructure

  • Untreated or partially treated sewage dumped into the sea: 80 million liters per day.
  • More than 90% of water is polluted (its origin is the Gaza Strip aquifer).

Education

  • 660 schools; 453,258 students; an average of 38 students per classroom; two shifts of school per day.
  • In 2009, 38,317 students graduated and were supposed to be absorbed by the labor market.

Construction and Rehabilitation

  • 86,000 housing units need to be constructed to meet the needs of the population (due both to natural growth and the destruction caused by the war).
  • 3,956,000 tons of cement are needed.
  • 653,600 tons of steel are needed.
  • 129 million meters of electric cables are needed.
  • Building materials whose transfer Israel prevents: cement, gravel, iron, marble, wood.
לפרסום מיידי, יום ג’, 14.6.10   שלוש שנים לסגר על עזה – נתונים יוני 2007 – יוני 2010: המעברים של רצועת עזה סגורים; הגבלות על מעבר סחורות ואנשים

  • הסגר על רצועת עזה הוא על רצועת חוף ששטחה 360 קמ”ר (139 מיילים מרובעים).
הגודל של עזה הוא מעט יותר מכפול מהגודל של וושינגטון די.סי. הגודל של עזה דומה לגודלן של סיאטל ופילדלפיה, ושווה ל- 1/3 מהגודל של העיר ניו יורק. השטח של ישראל הוא 22,072 קמ”ר–עזה נכנסת בישראל יותר מ–61 פעמים!

כלכלה משותקת לפי ישראל: מותר להעביר רק פריטים המוגדרים כמוצרים בסיסיים אשר “חיוניים להישרדותה של האוכלוסייה”.

  • מספר סוגי הפריטים אשר ישראל מתירה להעביר לרצועת עזה: 114. לפני הסגר: מעל 4,000 פריטים.
בסניף סופרמרקט גדול בישראל ישנם 10,000-15,000 פריטים.
  • בין היתר אוסרת ישראל על מעבר: קקאו, חומץ, מסטיקים, צעצועי ילדים, נייר, כלי נגינה.
  • משאיות עם סחורות הנכנסות לעזה: כ-2,300 בממוצע לחודש (2010); לפני הסגר: 10,400 בחודש (כ-25%).
למנהטן נכנסות 30,000 משאיות מדי יום (אוכלוסייה של כ-1.6 מיליון איש).
  • ישראל מונעת מעבר חומרי גלם לתעשייה כחלק מ”לוחמה כלכלית”, מדיניות שנועדה למנוע התפתחות כלכלית ברצועה כאמצעי לחץ: ישראל אוסרת על העברתם של גושים גדולים של מרגרינה לעזה אשר מיועדים לשימוש תעשייתי אך מאפשרת העברת חבילות קטנות של מרגרינה; ישראל אוסרת על העברת גומי, דבק וניילון אשר משמשים לייצור חיתולים ברצועת עזה אך מאפשרת העברת חיתולים תוצרת ישראל; ישראל מונעת העברת מלח תעשייתי, גלוקוז וקופסאות פלסטיק לייצור טחינה אך מאפשרת העברת טחינה תוצרת ישראל.
  • לפי הערכות של איגוד התעשיינים הפלסטינים בעזה, כ-90% מהמפעלים המשתייכים לאיגוד מושבתים מזה שלוש שנים או עובדים בתפוקה נמוכה.
  • יצוא: יוני 2007-היום: 259 משאיות יצאו מעזה; לפני הסגר: 70 משאיות ליום בממוצע (נכון לשנת 2005). במהלך שלוש השנים, ישראל אפשרה יצוא סחורה, בכמות פחותה מזו שנהוג היה לייצא בארבעה ימים.
חברת המזון הישראלית “תנובה” מוציאה בכל יום 400 משאיות מהמפעל שלה לרחבי ישראל.
  • גז בישול: 2,500 טונות לחודש בממוצע מועברים לעזה. הביקוש: 6,000 טונות לחודש.
  • אבטלה: 33.9% ברבעון הראשון של 2010.
  • משתתפים בשוק העבודה: 36.3% (304,900 איש).
  • 65% מתושבי עזה נמצאים מתחת לקו העוני.
  • נתמכים ע”י ארגוני סיוע בינ”ל: כ-80% מהאוכלוסייה.

אנשים חסומים ישראל מאפשרת מעבר אנשים אל עזה ומחוצה לה רק “במקרים הומניטריים וחריגים בלבד”.

  • מעבר רפיח: סגור מאז יוני 2007 באופן קבוע למעט פתיחות אקראיות ומצומצמות אשר עונות על 8% מהצורך של תושבי הרצועה. ב-2010 עברו 3,192 איש בממוצע בחודש (נכון לסוף מאי). לפני הסגר: כ-40,000 איש בממוצע יצאו ונכנסו דרך המעבר מידי חודש.
בנמל התעופה בן גוריון בת”א עוברים בממוצע כ-910,000 איש בחודש. במעבר אלנבי (בין ישראל לירדן) עוברים 125,000 איש בממוצע בחודש.
  • לא הומניטרי לפי ישראל: ביקור אישה המתגוררת בגדה המערבית את בעלה ברצועת עזה (“קשרי משפחה כשלעצמם אינם מהווים הצדקה הומניטארית מספקת”), ביקור ילדים את אביהם ברצועת עזה, ביקור בן מעזה את אימו הגוססת בירדן, יציאת סטודנטים ללימודים בגדה המערבית ובחו”ל, מעבר סוחרים, יציאה להשתלמויות ועוד.

תשתיות רעועות

  • ביוב לא מטופל או מטופל חלקית אשר נשפך לים: 80 מיליון ליטר ביום.
  • מעל 90% מהמים מזוהמים (מקורם באקוויפר של רצועת עזה).

חינוך

  • 660 בתי ספר; 453,258 תלמידים ; 38 תלמידים בכיתה בממוצע; 2 משמרות לימוד.
  • בשנת 2009 סיימו את ביה”ס: 38,317 תלמידים אשר אמורים להיקלט בשוק העבודה.

בנייה ושיקום

  • נדרשת בנייה של 86,000 יחידות דיור בכדי לענות על צרכי האוכלוסייה (הן מבחינת ריבוי טבעי והן לאור ההרס במלחמה).
  • נדרשים: 3,956,000 טונות של מלט.
  • 653,600 טונות של פלדה.
  • 129,000,000 מטרים כבלי חשמל.
  • חומרי בניין שישראל מונעת מעברם: מלט, חצץ, ברזל, שיש, עץ.
للنشر الفوري، الخميس،14.6.2010   ثلاث أعوام على فرض الإغلاق على غزة – معطيات حزيران 2007 – حزيران 2010: معابر قطاع غزة مغلقة، قيود على مرور البضائع والبشر

  • الإغلاق المفروض على قطاع غزة هو على شريط ساحلي تبلغ مساحته  360كلم ( 139ميل مربع).
مساحة غزة تفوق قليلا ضعف مساحة واشنطن العاصمة (دي.سي). مساحة غزة توازي مساحة سياتل وفيلادلفيا، وتساوي 1/3 مساحة مدينة نيويورك. تبلغ مساحة إسرائيل 22،072 كلم- تستوعب إسرائيل مساحة غزة أكثر من 61 مرة!

اقتصاد مشلول

  • حسب إسرائيل: يُسمح فقط بإدخال السلع المُعرفة كسلع أساسية “الضرورية لبقاء السكان”.
  • عدد أنواع السلع التي تسمح إسرائيل بإدخالها إلى قطاع غزة: 114. قبل الإغلاق: أكثر من4,000 سلعة.
يحتوي فرع سوبرماركت كبير في إسرائيل ما بين 15،000- 10،000 سلعة.
  • من بين السلع التي تحظر إسرائيل مرورها: مسحوق (بودرة) الكاكاو, الخل، العلكة, ألعاب الأطفال، الورق، آلات العزف.
  • شاحنات البضائع التي تدخل غزة: حوالي2,300 بالمعدل بالشهر (2010)؛ قبل الإغلاق: 10,400 في الشهر (حوالي-25%).
تدخل إلى مانهاتن 30،000 شاحنة يوميا (عدد السكان 1.6 مليون نسمة).
  • تمنع إسرائيل نقل المواد الخام للصناعة كجزء من “الحرب الاقتصادية”، وهي سياسة تهدف إلى منع التطور الاقتصادي في القطاع كوسيلة ضغط. تحظر إسرائيل نقل كُتل كبيرة من المرجرين إلى غزة والتي يتم استخدامها لأغراض صناعية، لكنها تسمح بنقل قطع صغيرة من المرجرين؛ تمنع إسرائيل نقل المطاط والصمغ والنايلون التي يتم استخدامها لإنتاج الحفاضات في قطاع غزة، لكنها تسمح بمرور الحفاضات المصنوعة في إسرائيل؛ تمنع إسرائيل نقل الملح الصناعي والغلوكوز وعلب البلاستيك لإنتاج الطحينة لكنها تسمح بنقل بإدخال الطحينة المصنوعة في إسرائيل.
  • وفقًا لتقديرات الاتحاد العام للصناعات الفلسطينية، قرابة 90% من المصانع التابعة للاتحاد مُغلقة منذ 3 سنوات أو أنها تعمل بإنتاجية متدنية.
  • التصدير: حزيران 2007- اليوم: 259 شاحنة خرجت من غزة؛ قبل الإغلاق: 70 شاحنة في اليوم بالمعدل (لعام 2005). خلال السنوات الثلاثة، سمحت إسرائيل بتصدير بضائع بكمية تقل عما كان يتم تصديره في أربعة أيام.
تخرج من شركة الغذاء الإسرائيلية “تنوفا” يوميًا 400 شاحنة إلى جميع أنحاء إسرائيل.
  • غاز الطبخ: 2,500 طن في الشهر بالمعدل تُنقل إلى غزة. الطلب: 6,000 طن في الشهر.
  • البطالة: 33.9% في الربع الأول من 2010.
  • مشاركون في سوق العمل: 36.3% (304,900 شخص).
  • 65% من سكان قطاع غزة يعيشون تحت خط الفقر.
  • يتلقون الدعم من منظمات الإغاثة الدولية: حوالي 80% من السكان.

بشر مقيدون

  • تسمح إسرائيل بمرور البشر من وإلى غزة في “الحالات الإنسانية والاستثنائية فقط”.
  • معبر رفح: مُغلق منذ حزيران 2007 بشكل دائم، ما عدا فتح المعبر بشكل عشوائي ومحدود يكفي لسد 8% من احتياجات سكان القطاع. سنة 2010 عبر 3,192 شخص بالمعدل في الشهر (حتى نهاية أيار). قبل الإغلاق: حوالي 40,000 شخص بالمعدل دخلوا وخرجوا عبر المعبر.
يمر عبر مطار بن غوريون في تل-أبيب 910،000 مسافر بالمعدل بالشهر. في معبر اللنبي (بين إسرائيل والأردن) يمر 125،000 شخص بالمعدل في الشهر.
  • غير إنساني حسب إسرائيل: زيارة امرأة تسكن في الضفة الغربية لزوجها المقيم في قطاع غزة (“العلاقات العائلية بحد ذاتها لا تُشكل مسوغًا إنسانيًا كافيًا”)، زيارة أطفال لأبيهم في قطاع غزة، زيارة إبن من غزة لأمه التي تحتضر في الأردن، خروج الطلاب للدراسة في الضفة الغربية وفي الخارج، مرور التجار، الخروج لدورات استكمال والمزيد من الحالات.

بنى تحتية مهترئة

  • مياه الصرف الصحي غير المعالجة أو المعالجة جزئيًا تتدفق إلى البحر: 80 مليون ليتر في اليوم.
  • أكثر من90% من مياه الشرب ملوثة (مصدرها من المياه الجوفية في قطاع غزة).

التعليم

  • 660 مدرسة؛ 453,258 طالب; 38 طالب في الصف بالمعدل؛ التعليم يتم بورديتين.
  • سنة 2009 أنهى التعليم المدرسي: 38,317 طالب ينبغي استيعابهم في سوق العمل.

البناء والتأهيل

  • يجب بناء 86,000 وحدة سكنية لسد احتياجات السكان (سواء من حيث التكاثر الطبيعي و بسبب دمار الحرب).
  • مطلوب: 3,956,000 طن اسمنت.
  • 653,600 طن حديد.
  • 129,000,000 متر من كوابل الكهرباء (للإستعمال المنزلي).
  • مواد بناء تمنع إسرائيل مرورها: اسمنت، حصى، حديد، شايش، خشب.