The French have called it a “water occupation” against the Palestinians…

World Water Day Photo Exhibit, (2011)
Stuart Littlewood

Stuart Littlewood

Now Britain helps the water thieves

There are few crimes more despicable then stealing your neighbour’s water.and polluting what’s left, then watching him and his children suffer thirst, disease and ruin.

Most of us would want nothing to do with the perpetrators of such evil.

British Water describes itself as the voice of the water industry.  It talks about best practice and corporate responsibility, and lobbies governments and regulators on behalf of its members. No doubt it does a good job.

It also has international ambitions including in the Middle East. So presumably it knows what’s going on water-wise in the Holy Land. Continue reading

Abbas: Israel has Abrogated the Peace Process

Juan Cole

Juan Cole, 12 Oct 2010

Palestinians declined to take the bait of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on Monday. Netanyahu offered an extension of the 10-month freeze on new Israeli settlements in the Palestinian West Bank in return for a PA acknowledgment of Israel as a “Jewish State.” Obviously, the phrase has some covert significance for the Israeli Right, and perhaps it is intended to bestow on Israel a right to denaturalize and expel Palestinian-Israelis. The phrase may also be intended to forestall any return to Israel of the Palestinians ethnically cleansed from that territory in 1948.

Fatah official Saeb Erekat said he could not understand what Israel’s self-definition had to do with negotiations over the shape of a Palestinian state, and pointed out that the PLO had exchanged letters in 1993 recognizing the state of Israel. (The Palestinians do not understand how the Israelis can negotiate over the West Bank in good faith if they are de facto annexing large swathes of it even as the talks proceed.)

Israeli foreign minister and far-right social engineer Avigdor Lieberman lost his temper Sunday in a meeting with the Spanish and French foreign ministers. He told them to go solve Europe’s own disputes before coming to the Mideast and instructing Israel how to resolve its. Lieberman is then accused in some quarters of having leaked his comments to the press, embarrassing Spain and France. He is said to have pointed to France’s ban on the niqab or full Muslim face veil, and to Switzerland’s ban on minarets as signs of European difficulty in dealing with Muslims.

(Lieberman does not appear to understand the difference between banning the niqab, which is worn by almost no one in Europe, and keeping over 4 million human beings for decades in a condition of statelessness wherein they have no real human or civil rights.)

Lieberman, already angling for title of most corrupt politician in elective office in the world, now appears to be trying for the additional title of Worst Foreign Minister in the history of foreign ministers.

Spain and France, undeterred, continued their fact-finding mission in the region. France’s Bernard Kouchner even admitted that it may be necessary to go to the United Nations for a declaration on a Palestinian state.

From another side, Mahmoud Abbas told the Arab League summit this weekend at Sirte, Libya, that Israel has unilaterally abrogated the Oslo accords and other understandings it had reached with the Palestine Authority. It has stripped the Authority of much of its power, and makes daily incursions into PA territory.

Abbas raises the possibility that if the negotiations with Netanyahu continue to be frozen, he would go to the UN General Assembly with a plan for a unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state, to be blessed by the UNO.

The problem is that although the UN could give Palestine a seat as a nation, unless the Israeli army were induced to withdraw from the West Bank and to cease blockading Gaza (which is being economically strangled by an illegal and inhumane Israeli ban on civilian exports), the resulting “state” would remain a fantasy.

If NATO would agree to reassign the troops now beginning to withdraw from Afghanistan to Palestine, and would face down any Israeli intransigence, now that would be a plan.

But nothing so dramatic is likely to ensue. Fanatics like Lieberman have taken over Israel and they have no future in a Muslim Middle East that is now growing faster than Israel economically and which is likely to become more and more militarily and scientifically sophisticated. As Obama’s initiative for a two-state solution is thwarted by the Liebermans and Netanyahus, their actions guarantee that Israel’s future in coming decades is bleak. Unfortunately, the attendant trouble generated by that bleakness is likely to fall on the heads of all our children.

Juan Cole

Juan R. I. Cole is Richard P. Mitchell Collegiate Professor of History at the University of Michigan. For three decades, he has sought to put the relationship of the West and the Muslim world in historical context. His most recent book is Engaging the Muslim World (Palgrave Macmillan, March, 2009) and he also recently authored Napoleon’s Egypt: Invading the Middle East (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007). You can visit his site at http://www.juancole.com/

Settler Arsonists strike Palestinian Mosques, Qurans, as Israeli Army Belly Dancing Video Surfaces

Juan Cole

Juan Cole, 5 Oct 2010

Palestinians in the village of Beit Fajjar near Bethlehem say that Israeli settlers snuck into their mosque and set fire to it, as well as burning copies of the Quran. Photos of the scene show scorched rugs where the fires were put out, and charred pages of the Muslim holy book. Graffiti in Hebrew calling for ‘revenge’ and a scrawled star of David was left behind.

Click on the photo here to see a series of images of the effects of the arson.

The provocative attack (most reports make too little of the burned Qurans) came in the context of Israeli cabinet meetings deciding whether to extend a ban on the building of new Israeli colonies on the Palestinian West Bank. It may be that the Israeli squatters in the Palestinian territory were hoping to provoke their victims to violence, as a way of discrediting them and ensuring that right wing cabinet members do not waver in opposition to talks with Palestine Authority president Mahmoud Abbas. (It would be asked how an Israeli government could talk to ‘terrorists,’ which is what right wing Israelis call pretty much all Palestinians.)

Aljazeera English has video:



The mosque arson and Quran-burning are typical of militant squatter tactics. In the past 18 months they have committed dozens of acts of arson against Palestinian property, including orchards and buildings. Although the Israeli military, which administers the Palestinian West Bank, says it is concerned about such actions, the Israeli perpetrators are almost never punished (the typical pattern in colonial settler regimes).

The way in which Occupation functions to constantly humiliate Palestinians in their own homeland and to deprive them of basic human and civil rights, is further demonstrated in the video that just surfaced of an Israeli army soldier mock belly dancing around a blindfolded and handcuffed Palestinian woman prisoner.



In a reminder of the banality of evil, humiliating prisoners is a war crime according to the Third Geneva Convention: Part I, Art. 2, “(c) outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment;”

But then that estate is characteristic of most Palestinians under Israeli military occupation.

Here is the fragmentation of the Palestinian West Bank as pursued by Israeli settlers:

fragmentation of the Palestinian West Bank (Courtesy InPursuitofJustice)

fragmentation of the Palestinian West Bank (Courtesy InPursuitofJustice)

Juan Cole

Juan R. I. Cole is Richard P. Mitchell Collegiate Professor of History at the University of Michigan. For three decades, he has sought to put the relationship of the West and the Muslim world in historical context. His most recent book is Engaging the Muslim World (Palgrave Macmillan, March, 2009) and he also recently authored Napoleon’s Egypt: Invading the Middle East (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007). You can visit his site at http://www.juancole.com/

Qalandia on the first Friday of Ramadan (2010)

Qalandia checkpoint (Photo: Nick Marouf)
Qalandia checkpoint (Photo: Nick Marouf)

Qalandia checkpoint (Photo: Nick Marouf)

Marian Houk, 15 August 2010

Since The Wall became a massive presence in the Palestinian West Bank a few years ago, and since Qalandia Checkpoint between Jerusalem and Ramallah (and the rest of the central and northern West Bank) grew to large proportions, it has become a major center of human activity on Fridays during the month of Ramadan, when Muslims fast for more than half of each day (from two hours before dawn until after sunset, when it is no longer possible to distinguish between a white and a black thread).

Each year, the arrangements have been different. There has been some effort at “improvement” from the Israeli side — and the results illustrate how difficult it is to improve anything through military regulation of human behavior.

For, how can you “improve” measures designed to restrict Palestinians from going to pray at Al-Aqsa Mosque on the esplanade known as Haram ash-Sharif in the Old City of East Jerusalem?

During Ramadan, Palestinian Muslims long to pray at Al-Aqsa Mosque. They just long to be there, for reasons linked to their belief about the significance and sacredness of the site and the increased value of any prayer they may perform there.

And, one 40-year-old Palestinian woman trying — unsuccessfully — to get through the checkpoint told me, it is now the only time of the year when the Israelis do give permits to get to Jerusalem for the prayers. Because, it is not enough just to fulfill the age requirements set, for “security reasons”: 50 years old, and married, for the men, and 35 years old, and married, for the women –they also have to have permits issued by the Israeli military, which has come to pieces of paper. It can take two days or more to get a permit to go to pray in Jerusalem on the Fridays in Ramadan. She had been in Jordan, and had not had time to go apply for a permit.

Qalandia Checkpoint during the Fridays in Ramadan is the epitome of the occupation.

Four years ago, when The Wall and the Checkpoint were new, and shocking, there were scenes of mass confusion and brutality: Israeli Border Police were on horseback facing a crush of tens of thousands of confused and angry Palestinians trying to get through the new obstacles. There had been no prior information on restrictions, nor any clear and consistent instructions on “permissions”.

Israeli soldiers lobbed tear gas on thousands of Palestinians who decided, spontaneously, to perform their prayers in front of the barriers at the Checkpoint, when the appointed time for the Friday noon prayer arrived, and they were still blocked on the Ramallah side by massed Israeli forces — who also apparently didn’t quite know what to expect, or what was going on.

Each year since then, there have been new rules.

Three years ago, the rules were changed overnight, even though previously-decided rules had been well-publicized. Palestinians who travelled from before dawn from all across the West Bank — many of whom had to cross multiple other Israeli military checkpoints before reaching Qalandia, were bitterly disappointed to discover that the Israeli military leadership had suddenly changed their mind, because a main Jewish religious holiday fell on the same date, and stricter admission to Jerusalem for Palestinians would mean privileged access for Jewish visitors coming from other places in Israel.

Two years ago, the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs sat at length with the Israeli Army’s District Coordination and Liaison officers to try to work out improvements. It was the first year that separate entrances — to the Checkpoint — were made for men and for women, a practice that continued again this year, which sometimes means that husbands and wives are separated, and sometimes one is admitted to the Checkpoint, and has a chance of going into Jerusalem, while the other does not. They keep in touch on their mobile phones.

It took until this year to make a third passage-way, for those who are sick and infirm. This year, the women were directed as pedestrians through one of the car lanes, which Israeli ladies from the Machsom Watch [Checkpoint Watch] organization said did improve the speed of the passage of the Palestinian women, who were lightly checked. The men were thoroughly checked.

Crowds at Qalandia were very light, which has been the case on the first Friday in Ramadan for each of the three previous years — but this year was even lighter than before.

Knowing how hard, and frustrating, and humiliating, it is, why do you still come, I asked the Palestinian woman who was still trying, without luck, to get through without a permit. “It is very important”, she said, dabbing the perspiration off her face with a handkerchief as we stood in the full heat of the noon-time sun. She did note that the prayer she would miss this week in Al-Aqsa could be made up next week — that is, if she can get a permit. “But as hard as it is, that is how much we love to be there for the prayer”, during Ramadan, she explained.

Israeli Border Police and soldiers were reinforced with black-uniformed members of the Israeli National Police’s Special Forces this year — and there seemed to be even more Arabic-speaking Israeli troops present this year. There was no tear gas used, no rubber bullets shot, and no stun grenades fired.

  • Marian Houk is the Editor of UN-Truth news site. She is a Member of the Online News Association, Member of the Foreign Correspondents Association (in Israel) and Marian Houk is a past President (1986) of the United Nations Correspondents Association (UNCA) at UNHQ/NY

Abbas: Israeli Colonization Impedes Start of Direct Talks

Juan Cole

Juan Cole, 12 July 2010
AFP Arabic reports that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said that there is no point in moving to direct negotiations with the Israelis until more progress is made on security and borders. In a speech in Ramallah, he said that creeping Israeli colonization of the Palestinian West Bank is illegal, and obstructs any move to final status negotiations because it plants an institution that claims to be legitimate in the midst of Palestinian territory. He said that Israel must completely remove these illegal colonies, which have been condemned repeatedly by resolutions of the United Nations Security Council. Abbas is also worried about the Israeli expulsion of Palestinians from Jerusalem, which he says could be a harbinger of large-scale expulsions of Palestinians from their territory. (For the Silwan controversy see this article.) Another Palestinian leader, Ahmad Qurei, on Sunday called Jerusalem a “time bomb.”

Abbas added that Tel Aviv continues to build new colonies on Palestinian land in the West Bank (including the part of the West Bank the Israelis unilaterally and illegally annexed to their Jerusalem district).

Abbas is clearly afraid that the Israeli side will come to the table for negotiations in bad faith, and will use the fact of ongoing direct talks as a screen for massive new colonization efforts, so that by the time the negotiations wrap up in ten years, the Palestinians have nothing left to bargain with and Greater Israel will be a fait accompli.

Abbas presumably spoke out in order to signal his resistance to being rushed into direct talks by pressure from Israel and Egypt, e.g., before the preconditions for successful talks (i.e. cessation of Israeli land theft) had been implemented.

The dilemma Palestinians face is exemplified by the villages and farms that are being split in two or fenced in by the Apartheid Wall, , as with Omar Hajaj of al-Walajah, who says he fears being caged like an animal in the zoo. Many Palestinian farmers can only farm their land or harvest their olives at the risk of being fired at, by the Israeli army or by armed, terroristic Israel colonists.

The health of the Palestinians of Gaza is still being damaged by the Israeli siege of the territory, which has only slightly eased.

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu gave further credence to Palestinian fears on Sunday when he insisted that the negotiations and their implementation would drag on past 2012. (That is not how it is done; decolonization projects, as with French Algeria or British Kenya, are best brought to a conclusion abruptly).

Netanyahu also continued the technique of misdirection, attempting to deflect pressure on him to stop stealing the Palestinian land that is supposedly being negotiated for by waving frantically in the direction of Iran and civilian nuclear enrichment program. The Israelis have presented no evidence for their assertion that it is more than that. And Netanyahu keeps misrepresenting Iran’s views on Israel. He ignores Tehran’s assertion that it will accept whatever resolution to the conflict with the Palestinians that is acceptable to the Palestinian side. He ignores Iranian leaders’ fatwas against nuclear weapons and their use, which would kill large numbers of civilians–something forbidden in the classical Islamic law of war. See my essay, The Top Ten Things you think you know about Iran that are not True.

  • Juan R. I. Cole is Richard P. Mitchell Collegiate Professor of History at the University of Michigan. For three decades, he has sought to put the relationship of the West and the Muslim world in historical context. His most recent book is Engaging the Muslim World (Palgrave Macmillan, March, 2009) and he also recently authored Napoleon’s Egypt: Invading the Middle East (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007). You can visit his site at http://www.juancole.com/