Shukran, Israel

Uri Avnery

Uri Avnery

IF ISLAMIST movements come to power all over the region, they should express their debt of gratitude to their bête noire, Israel.

Without the active or passive help of successive Israeli governments, they may not have been able to realize their dreams.

That is true in Gaza, in Beirut, in Cairo and even in Tehran.

LET’S TAKE the example of Hamas.

All over the Arab lands, dictators have been faced with a dilemma. They could easily close down all political and civic activities, but they could not close the mosques. In the mosques people could congregate in order to pray, organize charities and, secretly, set up political organizations. Before the days of Twitter and Facebook, that was the only way to reach masses of people. Continue reading

The King’s Speech

Uri Avnery
Uri Avnery

Uri Avnery

Uri Avnery

IN THE middle of the ’80s, a German diplomat conveyed to me a surprising message. A member of the Jordanian Royal family would like to speak with me in Amman. At the time, Jordan was still officially at war with us.

Somehow I obtained official permission from the Israeli government. The Germans generously provided me with a passport that was not strictly accurate, and so, with much turning of blind eyes, I arrived in Amman and was lodged in the best hotel.

The news of my presence spread quickly, and after some days it became an embarrassment to the Jordanian government. So I was politely asked to leave, and very quickly, please.

Continue reading

Israel Targets Students

Palestine Monitor

Palestine Monitor, 1 November 2010

On 26 August, Israeli forces stormed a student apartment in Birzeit.

“They arrested six students with political or activist ties,” said Anan Quzmar, coordinator of Right 2 Education (R2E), a student’s rights organization based in Birzeit University.

“They came in the middle of the night,” said Quzmar. “They arrested half a dozen students and trashed up the house.”

The students were taken to detainment facilities and then prison. A few were released, but most have remained behind bars, waiting for their hearing, to meet their lawyers, and see the single judge who will decide their fate.

Ameel Abdel was lucky. He had been picked up along with other members of a student group connected to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), or the second largest political organization in Palestine’s ruling coalition. As he sat in Ofer prison with other members of al-Kutob al-Tulab al-Democrati (Democratic Student Writers), his lawyer from the Palestinian advocacy group Addameer were hammering out a plea bargain.

“Since 2009 we’ve seen a heightened criminalization of human rights work,” said Magda Mughrabi, advocacy and outreach officer for Addameer. The lessons Israel took from international outcry over Operation Cast Lead and the flotilla fiasco was not restraint, but the need to repress intellectual resistance to the occupation. The students are part of the push to cripple the left inside Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories and, according to a database run by R2E, they are the latest in a systematic campaign of occupation.

The numbers are a shocking record of Israeli forces stunting Palestinian higher learning. Since 2003, 411 students have been arrested and one has been held for over three years, according to a 2009 report by R2E. Half of these students represented by R2E lawyers were “prisoners of conscience who are serving time solely for their belonging to student societies or political parties.”

The occupation’s pressures are a constant threat for students: nearly a third of students in Birzeit have been detained for “arbitrary interviewing.” Students know it’s a question of when, not if, they are picked up by Israeli forces. Sitting in his dormitory, student Rawad Darweesh was shocked, but not surprised, when sound bombs erupted around him.

“A feeling of horror filled the entire area – there were loud screams from the residences, and I immediately realized that there were Israeli jeeps all over the area,” wrote the student on R2E’s website in 2008. “Since I started at Birzeit University, I had watched it happen to other students, and I had been waiting for the day that my friends and I would be the ones targeted by the Israeli army – arrested with no charge in an attempt to frighten us.”

Addameer work to manumit these students and other prisoners, get visiting rights for their families, and better their incarceration. Their work is not easy: disenfranchisement is the Israeli military justice system’s design. Prosecution can submit “secret” evidence defense lawyers cannot discern or argue. Lawyers are refused permission to enter Israel from the West Bank in order to defend their clients. Many defendants are forced to sign documents they can’t understand, and, despite contrary court decisions, lawyers are similarly denied mandated translations. Just finding their clients in a labyrinthine penal system can take lawyers months. When they are finally allowed to meet, it is often just minutes before appearing in a court ruled by an Israeli soldier serving as the single judge. Prisoners can be detained by Israel for up to 90 without a lawyer, 188 days without being charged in a military court, and 730 days until the trial must be completed.

Targeting students is a systematic attack on civil society, said Mughrabi, designed to ruin the development of political challengers from within Palestine.

“Universities are a centre of future political leaders and social life in the making,” said Mughrabi. “Students who are political, who are affiliated with parties or part of student unions, are obviously, after graduating, more likely to remain politically active.”

As of March 2011, 6,631 Palestinians sat in Israeli detention. Currently, two out of every five Palestinian men has an Israeli prison record. But not all of those arrested go to Israeli prisons – twenty students and faculty from An-Najah University in Nablus are sitting in Palestinian Authority jail for belonging to rival parties like the PFLP and Hamas. It indicates a disturbing trend in the student arrests.

Political allegiances outside Fatah are disproportionately targeted, leading some to believe Israeli and PA forces cooperate – unofficially and perhaps inadvertently – to curb political pluralisation outside of the occupation’s precarious power balance.

“These people are often considered more dangerous than Palestinian leaders who signed off on Oslo or international development,” Mughrabi said.

Abdel was released after 25 days in jail – Addameer’s plea bargain worked. He confessed to joining the Marx-influenced Democratic Student Writers while in college and handing out political pamphlets. Abdel is now a free man, after agreeing to not participate in any banned political parties like the PFLP for eight years and paying 2,500 shekels.

Right 2 Education Addameer

The demand of a loyalty oath in Israel has ominous similarities to the demands made by Mussolini’s Italy

"Without loyalty--no citizenship" (Rita Castelnuovo/NYT)
"Without loyalty--no citizenship" (Rita Castelnuovo/NYT)

"Without loyalty--no citizenship" (Rita Castelnuovo/NYT)

Neve Gordon, 18 August 2010

Several weeks ago, hundreds of students demonstrated in front of Ben-Gurion University’s administration building. About a third of the protestors were expressing their opposition to the government’s decision to attack the relief flotilla, while the remaining two thirds came to support the government. At one point the pro-government protesters began chanting: ‘No citizenship without loyalty!’

While loyalty is no doubt an important form of relationship both in the private and public spheres, unpacking its precise meaning in the Israeli context reveals a disturbing process whereby the democratic understanding of politics is being inverted.

As Israeli citizens, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman want us to prove our loyalty to the flag by supporting a policy of oppression and humiliation. We must champion the separation barrier in Bi’lin and in other places throughout the West Bank. We have to defend the brutal destruction of unrecognized Bedouin villages, and the ongoing land grab both inside Israel and in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. We must support the checkpoints and the silent transfer in East Jerusalem. We are also expected to bow our heads and remain silent every time government ministers, Knesset members and public officials make racist statements against Arab citizens. We must support the neo-liberal policies that continuously oppress Israel’s poor, and we are obliged to give our blessing to the imprisonment of Gaza Strip’s 1.5 million residents.

Hearing the chants at the recent demonstration, I understood that I will never be able to accept this disastrously myopic form of loyalty. I refuse to be loyal to a policy of humiliation, racism and discrimination. And, yet, loyalty is an important issue that urgently needs to be discussed because ultimately there is a firm link between the state and loyalty. The pressing questions that need to be addressed are: What is the meaning of loyalty? And who is supposed to be loyal to whom?

Surprisingly, the answer to these questions is not particularly complex. According to the republican tradition, the state is first and foremost obliged to be loyal to its citizenry and is held accountable for inequities and injustices. Yet we are currently witnessing a complete reversal of the republican relationship between state and loyalty and the adoption, instead, of a proto-fascist approach.

Perhaps the most disturbing feature of this trend is that it is taking place on all levels of Israeli society. From the ongoing attacks against Israeli human rights organizations spearheaded by NGO Monitor and Im Tirzu, through the police response to the peaceful protests in Sheik Jarrah, and all the way to the McCarthyist atmosphere in the Knesset Education Committee, one witnesses how elements within civil society, the executive branch and the legislative branch are all working according to a logic similar to the one that informed Mussolini’s Italy.  All of these elements expect citizens to swear loyalty to the state regardless of the government’s policies.

However, because loyalty is a vital component of politics, we need to strive to ensure that the call for loyalty meet the requirements of a democratic rather than a fascist logic. We must demand that the state be loyal to all of its citizens, regardless of race, color, sex, gender, language, religion, political opinions, national or social origin, property, or birth status.

A state that is loyal to its citizens does not discriminate between Jews and Arabs, does not expropriate land from Muslims and Christians, does not humiliate and trample on the lower classes, and does not brutally oppress the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories. A state of this sort protects the rights of each and every citizen and, thus, will not need to demand loyalty because it will receive loyalty on a silver platter.

Yes, I too understand the importance of loyalty. But the appropriate chant is not ‘No citizenship without loyalty!’ but rather “Loyalty to every citizen!”

Neve Gordon is the author of Israel’s Occupation (University of California 2008) and can be reached through his website www.israelsoccupation.info

Wanted again, ethnic cleansing and more‏

Mazin Qumsiyeh

Mazin Qumsiyeh, 30 July 2010

After attending a workshop on developing curricula for nonviolence/popular resistance, I returned with a harrowing 12+ hour experience at the crossing from Jordan to the occupied Palestinian territories.  This included being served with an order/warrant for an appearance at the apartheid colonial ‘security’ offices in ten days and rifling through the books I brought back.  I recorded a 10 minute video telling of this experiences (common for Palestinians):

Heart-breaking Video: The Ethnic cleansing in the Negev by Israeli apartheid regime http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2010/jul/28/palestinian-territories-israel

Video: Israeli settler steels a sheep from Palestinian shepherds in South Hebron hills (Atwani)

Action: Free Ameer Makhoul

http://www.civicus.org/csw/1433

Ship from US to join next freedom flotilla (expected to draw 62 ships)

http://ustogaza.org/ny-boat-event/
http://palsolidarity.org/2010/07/13030/

Judaizing Jerusalem

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/07/judaizing-jerusalem.html

Israel Secret Police Exposed

http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=16165

Gilad Atzmon: Oliver Stone apologizes for telling the truth

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-oliver-stone-apologized-for-telling-the-truth.html

Mazin Qumsiyeh, PhD

A Bedouin in cyberspace, a villager at home

http://qumsiyeh.org

Palestine: The Forgotten Childhood

8-5-66a6c
Palestine Monitor, 24 July 2010
In 1991 Israel ratified The Convention of the Rights of a Child. The 54 articles of the Convention focus on the human rights of a child which include civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights. Despite Israel’s ratification of the Convention, Palestinian children are still victims of human rights abuses in all of these categories.

The occupied Palestinian territories have one of the highest birthrates in the region. Over 50 % of the population is under the age of 18. Thirty percent of the population in Palestine falls below the poverty line. Of the poor, 54 % are children.

In 2009, more that 300 children lost their homes after they were demolished from order of the Israeli authorities.

Not including Operation Cast Lead, since January 2009, Israeli army have killed 20 children. In the last ten years 1,333 Palestinian children have been killed in conflict.

Many children do not have direct or safe passage to schools. Children as young as age six walk up to forty-five minutes to get to school because of the separation barrier, road closures, and/or settlements.

In the South Hebron Hills many children are subjected to violence attacks by settlers on their way to school. Since 2004, 92 children have been victims of violence from settlers.

Thirty-five percent of the time, soldiers did not walk with the children and 85% of the time the military escorts failed to complete the full journey to school, leaving children unaccompanied and vulnerable to violence.

Around 700 adolescents between 12 and 17 are detained by the Israeli military each year. In contravention of international law, most prisons that detain children are in Israel which significantly limits family access.

The psychological impact on children is profound. According to UNICEF, nearly of third of all children experience anxiety, phobia, or depression. Over 50,000 children received psychosocial counseling to help them cope with violence.

Nearly 10% of children under the age of five suffer from chronic malnutrition. Anemia is problematic for nearly 50% of children under the age of two and vitamin A deficiency is endemic in 70 % of children.

The unemployment rate in the occupied Palestinian territories is over 20%. Thirty percent of children drop out of school at age 16 and 17. The boys need to find work to help the family financially and the girls are pressured into marriage.