Palestinian clowns are everywhere

Sam Bahour

Sam Bahour

Sam Bahour

Some Palestinians refuse to just sit still and accept their fate as a permanently, militarily occupied people. One would think by now that Palestinians would have received the message loud and clear – the world couldn’t care less about their fate. But no, these Palestinians just refuse to sit still. They continue to defy their reality and can be seen across the Holy Land – jumping, climbing, swinging, falling, tripping, singing, twirling, juggling, cycling, tight roping, and the like. Their nerve! To think they can attempt to live a normal life when the powers that be are spending billions, literally, to cause a collapse of Palestinian society. Continue reading

‘Free Palestine’ book is posted on the Internet as Holy Land looks to United Nations for justice and liberty

Radio Free Palestine
Radio Free Palestine

Radio Free Palestine

A book telling the plight of the Palestinians under the longest military occupation in modern times has just been made available on the Internet in flip-page form.

It comes at a critical time for Palestinians as the UN considers their bid for statehood while America and the EU try to derail the application and force them back to negotiations with their tormentor, Israel.

The book, by Stuart Littlewood and Phillip Vine, was inspired by visits to the Occupied Territories. “The Holy Land and its people made a lasting impression on us both,” says Stuart. “Phillip produced the deeply moving poetry while my task was to shoot pictures and write the narrative.”

Radio Free Palestine is 172 pages with over 110 colour photos. It can now be read by visiting

www.radiofreepalestine.org.uk

Stuart hopes it will help people understand what lies behind the Palestinians’ application to the United Nations. “It is a story of betrayal by the Western Powers, especially Britain and the United States. It is not taught in schools or covered accurately by mainstream media, and Parliament is so heavily influenced by the pro-Israel lobby that honest debate is regarded as ‘politically incorrect’.”

The Foreword, by 2006 Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jeff Halper, Co-ordinator of ICAHD (Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions, see www.icahd.org ), describes the book as “a cry from the heart, written in moral anger by a person who bothered to leave his comfortable surroundings far from the suffering of another people, the Palestinians, and share, witness, expose and protest in the strongest voice he could find at what he saw and heard, what so few others have even cared to see or hear.”

Christians and Muslims in the West Bank and Gaza have been slaughtered or had their homes, farms and water resources stolen while waiting in vain 63 years for the international community to deliver justice. Those who remain are prisoners inside sealed borders, unable to travel freely within their own territory, visit relatives, find work, choose which university to attend, or even worship at their holy places in Jerusalem. Israel now plans to steal their offshore gas.

Gaza continues to suffer under naval blockade and two-and-a-half years ago was ferociously bombarded in a killing-spree that annihilated 1,400 souls including hundreds of women and children, leaving thousands more maimed, making tens of thousands homeless and destroying vital infrastructure. Ships bringing humanitarian relief have been attack on the high seas with impunity . Fishermen are regularly fired on if they put to sea.

The Christian population, once 20 percent, has now dwindled to around 2 percent. At this rate there will soon be no Christians where Christianity was born. The United Nations does nothing, Western Christendom does nothing and Britain and the EU continue to reward Israel with trading privileges.

Radio Free Palestine was published in 2007 and sold through Church channels so has not been widely available until now. “Phillip and I thought we should put it on the web for anyone and everyone to read in the hope that more people will know what is happening and why an immediate end to the occupation is so important to world peace,” says Stuart.

“We wish all our friends in the Palestine good fortune in their quest for justice and freedom.”

Stuart Littlewood

Stuart Littlewood

Stuart Littlewood is a marketing specialist turned writer-photographer. He is a regular contributor to online news magazines such as VeteransToday, PalestineChronicle, RamallahOnline, Salem-News, MyCatbirdSeat, Intifada-Palestine, SabbahReport, Redress and ThePeoplesVoice, which carry news and comment suppressed by mainstream media. He can be contacted at stubizz@gmail.com (correspondence only, no junk please).

Archbishop Tutu supports divestment

BDS-Stickers

2 April, 2011

Desmond M. Tutu, Archbishop Emeritus of South Africa gestures during the session 'Believing in the Dignity of All' at the Annual Meeting 2009 of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, February 1, 2009.

Desmond M. Tutu, Archbishop Emeritus of South Africa gestures during the session 'Believing in the Dignity of All' at the Annual Meeting 2009 of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, February 1, 2009.

Dear University of Arizona Community,

I am writing today to express my wholehearted support of the students in No Más Muertes/No More Deaths humanitarian/migrant-rights group and their institutional statement advocating divestment or business severance from the Caterpillar and Motorola corporations.  I appreciate their insistence for your school to terminate this relationship on the grounds of these companies providing military-style technology and assistance to U.S. forces committing systematic abuses in Arizona and nationwide.  I also think it is important that the students are highlighting these same companies that provide similar technology and assistance for Israel to use in its illegal military occupation and settlement of Palestinian lands.
When an immigrant is criminalized in Arizona or elsewhere in the U.S. for not having the right papers as he tries to make a living, I stand with him.  When a Palestinian man stands for hours at an Israeli military checkpoint in order to get to his job and make a living, I stand with him.  And I ask you to stand with me, with them, as the students are at the threshold of a new movement that seeks justice by withdrawing support for injustice.

 

I am not speaking from an ivory tower.  Degradation and humiliation of innocent people harassed over their “legal” status and documentation was prevalent throughout the reign of Apartheid. We lived it—police waking an individual up in the middle of the night and hauling him/her off to jail for not having his/her documents on hand while s/he slept.  The fact that they were in his/her nightstand near the bed was not good enough.

 

In South Africa, we could not have achieved our freedom and just peace without the help of people around the world, who, through the use of non-violent means, such as boycotts and divestment, encouraged their governments and other corporate actors to reverse decades-long support for the Apartheid regime.  Students played a leading role in that struggle, and I write this letter with a special indebtedness to and earnest gratitude for your school, the University of Arizona, for its role in advocating equality in South Africa and promoting corporate ethical and social responsibility to end complicity in Apartheid.

 

The same issue of equality is what motivates the students’ divestment movement today, linking the issues of immigrant/indigenous rights in the U.S. and the Israeli occupation of Palestine.  The movement students are leading in Arizona to better the conditions there and in Palestine is politically refreshing and should be an inspiration to us all.

 

It was with immense joy that I learned of the massive mock apartheid wall the students erected through your campus to bring these issues to the forefront.  The students cleverly label their mock border wall “Concrete Connections” to symbolize the intersection of interests that guide U.S. policy in militarized Arizona and in Israeli-occupied Palestine.

 

I was reminded of how similarly touched I was when I visited American campuses like yours in the 1980s and saw students creating mock shanty towns and demonstrating in the baking sun to protest the brutal conditions of Apartheid.  Is my hope that the creative action by the students will inspire a new movement of mock walls dividing campuses across the U.S. to show how the militarized border not only runs along Arizona and the Southwestern region but everywhere in the United States where communities of immigrants, indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities are raided, abused or exploited.  Such demonstrations can also show that in every corner of the United States sits the potential to help end the Israeli occupation by withdrawing U.S. funding and support which makes it possible.

 

The abuses faced by people in Arizona and in Palestine are real, and no person should be offended by principled, morally consistent, non-violent acts to oppose them.  It is no more wrong to call out the U.S. governments—at the federal and Arizona state levels—for their abuses in Arizona and throughout the country than it was to call out the Apartheid regime for its abuses.  Nor is it wrong to single out Israel for its abuses in the occupied Palestinian territory as it was to single out the Apartheid regime for its abuses.

I am writing to tell you that, despite what detractors may allege, the students are on the right track and are doing the right thing.  They are doing the moral thing.  They are doing that which is incumbent on them as humans who believe that all people have dignity and rights, and that all those being denied their dignity and rights deserve the solidarity of their fellow human beings.

 

With these truths and principles in mind, I join with the students in No Más Muertes and implore your school to divest any form of business investment, whether stocks, bonds, or other business agreements, from companies such as Caterpillar and Motorola, as a symbolic gesture of non-participation in conditions and practices that are abominable.  To those who wrongly accuse us of unfairness or harm done to them by this call for divestment, I suggest, with humility, that the harm suffered from being confronted with opinions that challenge one’s own pales in comparison to the harm done by living a life under occupation and daily denial of basic rights and dignity.

 

It is not with rancor that we criticize the Israeli and U.S./AZ governments, but with hope, a hope that a better future can be made for both Israelis and Palestinians—for migrant, indigenous, and all peoples regardless of immigration status; a future in which both the violence of the occupier and the resulting violent resistance of the occupied come to an end, and where one people need not rule over another, engendering suffering, humiliation, and retaliation. True peace must be anchored in justice and an unwavering commitment to universal rights for all humans, regardless of ethnicity, religion, gender, national origin or any other identity attribute, including national citizenship.  Students are helping to pave that path to a just peace and they deserve your support.  I encourage you to stand firm on the side of what is right.
God bless you.

Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu (Cape Town, South Africa)

Israel’s Persecution of Ameer Makhoul

Stephen Lendman

Stephen Lendman

At any time, from 7,000 – 12,000 or more Palestinians are politically persecuted and imprisoned, including young children. The Addameer Prisoners’ Support and Human Rights Association explains that for over 43 years under military occupation, over 650,000 Palestinians have been illegally detained for wanting freedom on their own land in their own country, what Israel won’t tolerate, nor have its leaders ever wanted peace. Saying so is a lie.

What Avi Shlaim once said about Ariel Sharon, applies to virtually all other Israeli leaders, past and present; namely, that “Bargaining, accommodation, and compromise (were) alien to his whole way of thinking.”

Sharon earlier, and Netanyahu today, share like-minded views; namely, that “relations with the Palestinians (are) a zero-sum game” in which Israel intends to gain at their expense, including its own Arab citizens. Both leaders spurn concessions, Sharon once saying, “This is our land, and we’ll settle it and build on it in order to prevent the creation of a Palestinian state. We’ll never give up this area.” As a result, Palestinians have been ruthlessly persecuted, imprisoned, or slaughtered in gross violation of international laws.

Ameer Makoul is one of many victims, a previous article about him accessed through the following link:

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/05/israeli-persecution-of-human-rights.html

An Israeli citizen, human rights activist, and head of the internationally recognized Ittijah NGO for Palestinian empowerment, he also chairs the Public Committee for the Defence of Political Prisoners within the Arab Higher Monitoring Committee in Israel. Besides championing human rights, he also supports the global BDS movement, what many believe is perhaps the most effective nonviolent tactic against Israeli lawlessness, and another reason for his targeting.

An earlier article on Palestinian Political Prisoners can be accessed through the link below:

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/03/palestinian-political-prisoners.html

Makhoul’s Ordeal

In May, Makhoul was arrested on spurious charges of spying for Hezbollah, Israel’s way to silence a respected Palestinian. At the time, attorney Hussein Abu Hasin said accusations were so vague and wide-ranging that emails, Internet chats or phone conversations with anyone about anything could be used as a pretext to prosecute for communicating with a “state enemy,” whether or not true and regardless of the right to speak freely with anyone.

At the time, Mohammed Zeidan, head of the Human Rights Association of Nazareth said:

“We are used to our political leaders being persecuted, but now Shin Bet is turning its sights on the leaders of Palestinian civil society in Israel, and that’s a dangerous development.” Based on suspicions, circumstantial evidence, or none at all, Shin Bet’s likely to target anyone “unwittingly….meet(ing) a relative of a relative of someone in Hezbollah, (Hamas, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Islamic Jihad, or the Iranian government as) grounds to arrest you.” Activist leaders are notably threatened, especially Israeli Arabs seen by hard liners as a fifth column existential threat essential to crush.

Zeidan believes that persecution of Israeli Arab society is the best way to expose Israeli racism and discrimination against anyone not Jewish. “Markhoul’s arrest should be understood in that light.”

On May 6, his ordeal began when about 20 Israeli police and security forces arrested him at 3:10AM, ransacked his apartment, confiscated his computers, cell phones, various documents, maps, and other possessions. At the same time, his Haifa office was also raided for other potentially “incriminating” evidence, a Shin Bet warrant saying only that “secret information” justified it for “security reasons,” when, in fact, none whatsoever existed.

On May 9, Ynetnews.com writer Sharon Roffe-Ofir headlined, “Security scandal angers Arab sector,” saying:

Despite a gag order, aroused Israeli Arabs freely discussed Israeli “police persecution of (the) Arab community….In Facebook, a protest group has already been set up, and (days earlier) an emergency conference was held by the Mossawa Center and the Adalah Center, both of which are among the most prominent organizations working for Arab rights,” along with many others expressing concern. Wide distribution of information followed through newspapers, blogs, and word of mouth.

Mossawa’s director, Jafar Farah, called “the steps taken by (Israel’s) security establishment….an extreme right wing policy. In democratic countries,” this type lawlessness is prohibited. The Popular Committee for the Defense of Freedoms said Israel’s attack on freedom “is at its height.” MK Masud Ganaim (of United Arab List-Ta’al) sent thousands of emails calling the affair:

“police terror and silencing. What is happening is clear proof of racism. Whoever claims Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East gets new evidence to the contrary every day, in the steps taken by the government and its institutions against citizens, parties and organizations of the Arab sector.”

Makhoul was detained incommunicado at Petah Tikva for interrogation. Under gag order (now lifted), the Israeli media couldn’t write or discuss anything about his case.

He endured 12 days of brutal interrogation, including torture and sleep deprivation. After three weeks, he was charged with espionage, helping an enemy (Hezbollah) in time of war, contact with a foreign agent, and other spurious charges, all of which he denied.

On June 14, prosecutors claimed “secret evidence” against him, withheld from his lawyers for “security reasons.” In addition, all attorney conversations were wiretapped, and despite requesting medical help from the Association of Physicians for Human Rights, it was repeatedly denied.

He remains imprisoned, a Committee for the Defense of Ameer Makhoul established on September 8 to defend him. Comprised of dozens of Jewish and Arab figures, it took collective responsibility because:

– his arrest signifies what he represents, not just himself, and it was done to warn other activist Israeli Arabs; and

– charges against him are entirely unfounded and spurious, his targeting to silence a respected, powerful, effective political voice for all Arab Israeli citizens.

He’s represented them globally as an internationally recognized human rights advocate, and as a member of world and regional coalitions and networks. Speaking publicly or in any other way to anyone is protected speech, yet accusations against him violate his legitimate right to communicate freely with Arab colleagues.

On September 16, he was charged in Haifa District Court, even though Israeli prosecutors said his home and office computers, cell phones, other possessions, and transcripts of about 30,000 wiretapped phone conversations revealed no evidence of espionage.

On September 14, his lawyers got the Nazareth District Court to uphold his right to direct and confidential counsel access, what he previously was denied in violation of Israeli and international law. Earlier in 2009, Shin Bet said they’d “tailor a file for this disappearance and prolonged separation from his family” unless he softened his outspoken activism, including his denunciation of Cast Lead war crimes.

Human rights groups, including Amnesty International have been outspoken for him, AI signaling it may declare him a “prisoner of conscience” because his arrest “smacks of pure harassment, designed to hinder his human rights work.”

Ahead, the Committee for the Defense of Ameer Makhoul needs help to raise funds, mobilize international legal and medical help as well as observers for his trial. Some tactical victories have been won, however, including disseminating information globally on his case and defeating Israel’s gag order. Remaining tasks include building a solid defense team, challenging prosecutorial use of “secret evidence” unavailable to counsel, as well as bogusly incriminating anyone for using protected speech to communicate freely with anyone.

A Final Comment

Ahmad Sa’adat is another prominent Israeli political prisoner, an earlier article on him accessed through the following link:

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/07/ahmad-saadat-palestinian-prisoner-of.html

He’s the General Secretary of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), sentenced in 2002 to 30 years imprisonment for supporting Palestinian liberation heroically.

On October 4, an International Campaign for the Release of Kidnapped Palestinian Legislators press release said he’s spent over “500 days in solitary confinement under the most inhumane conditions….to break (his) will and steadfastness.”

Brutal torture, abuse and humiliation are longstanding Israeli longstanding practices, including against children. In mid-October, Sa’adat will challenge his isolation in court, as well as his overall inhumane treatment, denying his basic rights, including:

– virtually no family and legal visits;

– isolation from other prisoners;

– only 30 minute daily prison yard access, in painful handcuffs and ankle shackles;

– little reading material and no personal books;

– brutal interrogations, including physical and psychological torture;

– no canteen purchases; and

– like other political prisoners, no proper food, medical care, proper ventilation and sanitation, adequate clothing, or virtually all other basic necessities for health and well-being, in violation of fundamental international laws, including Geneva’s Common Article 3 requiring:

“humane treatment for all persons in enemy hands, specifically prohibit(ing) murder, mutilation, torture, cruel, humiliating and degrading treatment (and) unfair trial(s).

Israel, like America, flouts the rule of law. As a result, Palestinians have been victimized for over six decades, denied any measure of justice and freedom. Makhoul and Sa’adat are two of thousands enduring Israeli savagery, its longstanding practice against Muslim Arabs.

Stephen Lendman

Stephen Lendman

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/

Israel’s Settlement Enterprise: Longstanding, Outrageous and Illegal

Settlement Expansions 2009

Stephen Lendman, 12 July 2010

B’Tselem, the Israeli human rights organization, addressed it in its July 2010 report titled, “By Hook and By Crook: Israel’s Settlement Policy in the West Bank”, ahead of a July 6 meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Obama, their fifth – a shameless love fest endorsing Israeli crimes, Obama saying Israel has “got to be able to respond to threats or any combination of threats in the region,” ones it manufactures to pursue ruthless, lawless policies, nonviolent civilians the victims.

On July 5, Israeli National News.com writer Hillel Fendel headlined, “Timed to Sabotage,” quoting Yesha Council (YC) head Danny Dayan calling B’Tselem “an anti-Zionist tool for the destruction of Israel,” citing the report and its report release date as one example.

YC (the Hebrew acronym for Judea, Samaria, and Gaza) is the successor to Gush Emunim (“Block of the Faithful”), the militant pro-settlement movement committed to Palestinian displacement, its members influential in Israeli politics, advocating a Greater Israel exclusively for Jews, its ideology based on religious zealotry, its members calling Cast Lead a religious war, its bogus justification for systemic violence, barbarism, military occupation, land theft, and efforts to silence truth.

According to Dayan:

“Not one Arab has been deprived of his land to build Jewish homes in Judea and Samaria. Unlike in previous settlement enterprises, such as the kibbutzim of several decades ago, when there was no other choice….Since 1974, not one piece of privately-owned Arab land has been confiscated – and those that were, were totally compensated for, either in money or land,” calling much in B’Tselem’s report “an absolute lie,” saying its “concern for human rights….just an excuse….to weaken Israel.”

Other Israeli, Palestinian, and international human rights organizations disagree, publishing volumes of confirming material, what zealots like Dayan want suppressed or condemned if made public.

In preparing its report, B’Tselem used official Israeli data, including state comptroller statistics, Civil Administration maps, and attorney Talia Sasson’s material on Israeli outposts, based on documents produced by Brig. General Baruch Spiegel.

Combined they show a half million Israelis “living over the Green Line: more than 300,000 in 121 settlements and about (100) outposts, which control 42 per cent of….the West Bank, and the rest in (12) neighborhoods” in Jerusalem Municipality annexed land.

From inception, Israel’s settlement policy has been based on “an instrumental, cynical, and even criminal approach to international law, local legislation, Israeli military orders, and Israeli law, (that’s facilitated the systematic) pilfering of land from Palestinians in the West Bank,” ongoing for decades to seize all valued areas, including Jerusalem to make it exclusively Jewish.

How? By bogusly declaring “state land,” resulting in the theft of about 16% of the West Bank, mostly from 1979 – 1992, but the process remains ongoing.

The State Attorney’s Office interpretation of the Ottoman Land Law, in fact, “contradicted explicit statutory provisions and judgments of the Mandatory Supreme Court,” facilitating land seizures, including privately owned Palestinian property, expropriated illegally, comprising 21% of settlement areas.

To encourage migration, benefits and incentives are offered, most settlements given National Priority Area A status, entitling them to:

– quality, low-cost housing with subsidized mortgages;

– free education from age three and extended school days;

– free transportation to and from schools, and higher teacher salaries to attract qualified ones to move;

– for industry and agriculture, grants and subsidies, indemnification from EU produce tariffs, significantly lower taxes than inside the Green Line, and

– larger balancing grants to help settlements cover deficits.

Palestine belongs to the Palestinians, the UN’s 1947 Resolution 181 artificially partitioning it, giving the choicest 56% to Jews, the remainder to Palestinians with Jerusalem an international city under a UN Trustee Council – a binding provision to this day.

In 1948, Israel’s “War of Independence” seized another 22%, in total 78% of historic Palestine, the 1967 Six Day War taking the rest, placing Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem under military occupation, thereafter systematically violating international humanitarian laws with regard to:

– illegal large and smaller-scale acts of aggression, inflicting mass deaths, injuries and destruction, mostly against civilians;

– free movement, expression and the right of assembly;

– the universally acknowledged right of return;

– Palestinians’ right to their own resources on their own land, including water and extensive offshore gas reserves, stolen to benefit Israel;

– East Jerusalem – annexed despite Security Council Resolution 478, declaring Israel’s July 1980 Jerusalem Law null and void with no legal validity;

– the Separation Wall on expropriated land, about 12% of the West Bank when completed (ruled illegal by the International Court of Justice);

– Palestinians’ access to their own land, air space, coastal waters, and control of their borders;

– illegally incarcerating thousands of political prisoners;

– systematically using torture, abuse and degrading treatment, illegal at all times, under all conditions, with no allowed exceptions;

– conducting targeted assassinations and other willful killings of non-combatant civilians;

–bogusly calling Palestine’s democratically elected government “terrorist,” refusing recognition, imposing an embargo, and conducting regular incursions against it;

– committing slow motion genocide against 1.5 million Gazans under seige, Israel’s so-called easing mostly subterfuge to keep it harshly in place; and

– decades of illegal settlement building on expropriated land, dispossessing protected persons, transferring their property to Jews, claiming bogus legal justification for whatever it does, absolution for being Jewish, the exceptionalism notion America uses, international law valid only for others, not themselves.

In fact, it’s universally binding, Israel, like America, a serial abuser, B’Tselem explaining:

“Israel has ignored the relevant rules of law, adopting its own interpretation, which is not accepted by almost all leading jurists around the world and by the international community,” its settlement enterprise one of many infringements of Palestinian rights, including:

– the right of property denied by land theft;

– equality and due process under military occupation;

– the right “to an adequate standard of living,” official policy to deny it to non-Jews;

– the right of free movement, expression, assembly, and self-determination under a viable Palestinian state or one nation for all citizens alike, what virtually all other countries allow inside fixed borders, not flexible ones so Israel can illegally expand.

B’Tselem’s report, like many others, exposes the “cloak of (illegality) that Israel has sought to (justify the) theft of West Bank (and East Jerusalem) land,” an illegal way it “advance(s its) political objectives,” by infringing on the rights of others – Palestinians, persecuted by successive regimes, claiming democratic credentials, revealed as ruthless, barbarous, and lawless against non-Jews, what growing millions globally are discovering, including many thousands of Jews, condemning what they’ll no longer tolerate, nor should anyone.

A Final Note

Even Israeli Jews are oppressed, heroic whistleblower/prisoner of conscience Mordechai Vanunu perhaps the most noted.

After being incarcerated for 18 years for exposing Israel’s secret nuclear program, he was imprisoned again on May 23, charged with contacting a foreign national, despite his legal right to do it, his right of free expression.

Then on June 18, Amnesty International (AI) reported him in solitary confinement, Malcolm Smart, AI’s Middle East Program director explaining:

“Mordechai Vanunu should not be in prison at all, let alone….in solitary confinement in a unit intended for violent criminals. He suffered immensely when he was held in solitary confinement for 11 years after his imprisonment in 1986 and to return him to such conditions now is nothing less than cruel, inhuman (and) degrading.”

After his April 2004 release, he was prohibited from leaving the country, approaching foreign embassies, and communicating with foreigners, including journalists, as well as required to get permission to change his address. In addition, a draconian military order, renewed biannually, kept him under surveillance and police supervision, denying his fundamental rights to free movement, expression, and association.

Held at central Israel’s Ayalon Prison, his lawyer, Michael Sfard, said he’s “suffering from isolation. He should not be made to pay a price because of the enmity of others towards him,” recrimination against anyone challenging state policies, an agenda above the law and fundamental humanitarian principles – for over six decades, disregarded and spurned, the way all rogue states operate, Israel today a global menace, the region’s most dangerous.

  • Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening. http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.
Settlement Expansions 2009
Settlement Expansions 2009

Decades of Palestinian Displacement in East Jerusalem

Stephen Lendman

Stephen Lendman, 9 July 2010

The UN General Assembly’s 1947 Resolution 181 internationalized Jerusalem as a separate body (a corpus separatum), administered by a UN Trustee Council, a policy still binding but not followed. Nor have other resolutions or international law provisions Israel rejects, ones interfering with its military occupation, affecting E. Jerusalem Palestinians repressively since June 1967, more still after passage of the July 30, 1980 Basic Law, declaring “Jerusalem, complete and united, is the capital of Israel.”

Yet on June 30, 1980, the Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 476 (America abstaining), declaring “all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which purport to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem have no legal validity and constitute a flagrant (Fourth Geneva) violation.”

Following Israel’s non-compliance, the SC unanimously passed Resolution 478 (America again abstaining), “censur(ing Israel) in the strongest term” for enacting the Jerusalem Basic Law, calling it a violation of international law, saying the Council doesn’t recognize it, and telling member states to withdraw their diplomatic missions from the city.

The Security Council and General Assembly reaffirmed their positions that East Jerusalem is occupied territory, that expropriating its land is illegal, and that all Israeli legislative and administrative measures, altering the city’s character and status, are null and void and must be rescinded forthwith. To this day, Israel never complied, continuing its relentless policies of land seizures, home demolitions, and dispossessions, flagrantly flouting its obligations under international law.

Also its illegal occupation in defiance of Hague Regulation 43, stating:

“The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in (its) power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country.”

In addition, temporary administrative powers only are authorized, legitimate sovereignty to be restored as soon as possible, never indeterminately held by the occupier, what Israel has done for over 43 years, preventing the restoration of the pre-war status quo.

Under Article 64, Fourth Geneva explained it further, stating:

“The penal laws of the occupied territory shall remain in force, with the exception that they may be suspended by the Occupying Power in cases where they constitute a (legitimate) threat to its security or an obstacle to the application of the present Convention….

The Occupying Power may, however, subject the population of the occupied territory to provisions, which are essential to enable the Occupying Power to fulfill its obligations under the present Convention, to maintain the orderly government of the territory, and to ensure the security of the Occupying Power, of members and property of the occupying forces or administration….”

The Occupier may do nothing to enhance the economic or political deterioration of territory it controls, or permit societal chaos in it by its actions or inaction. Nor may it deprive the public of their rights and protections under Geneva or do anything in violation of international humanitarian law, such as imposing collective punishment, forcible transfers, or confiscations of private property. It may enact no laws or impose any measures that violate its legal obligations.

For the past 43 years, especially since July 30, 1980 in East Jerusalem, Israel has systematically and willfully flouted the law, severely repressing Palestinians, (protected persons under Fourth Geneva), aimed at displacing them.

In her 1999 book, “Separate and Unequal: The Inside Story of Israeli Rule in East Jerusalem,” former Advisor on Arab Affairs under Teddy Kollek, (Jerusalem’s mayor from 1965 – 1993), Amir Cheshin, explained Israeli policy saying:

“Israel’s leaders adopted two basic principles in their rule of East Jerusalem. The first was to rapidly increase (its) Jewish population….The second was to hinder growth of the Arab population and to force Arab residents to make their homes elsewhere.”

Since 1967, it was binding Israeli policy, evident today from the Haaretz Akiva Eldar and Nir Hasson June 28 article, headlined “Jerusalem master plan: Expansion of Jewish enclaves across the city,” saying:

“The Jerusalem District Planning and Building Committee is set to approve an unprecedented master plan that calls for the expansion of Jewish neighborhoods in East Jerusalem….The committee’s proposal would codify the municipality’s planning policy for the entire city,” those objecting allowed 60 days to respond. However, at this “stage in the planning process,” rarely ever are plans altered, its approval “a fate accompli,” regardless of criticisms voiced.

Envisioned for years, architects have been working on it for over a decade to replace an earlier 1959 plan, eight years before the Six Day War. Once approved, accelerated Palestinian home demolitions and dispossessions will follow, Al Jazeera reporting on June 22 that 22 Silwan neighborhood homes will be replaced by a new tourist center, Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat announced, final approval pending, Silwan residents saying it “fast-track(s the city’s) Judaisation,” preempting “the possibility of Jerusalem ever being a shared city, or indeed capital of a Palestinian state. This in itself precludes peace.”

Israeli officials said all 88 Silwan homes are illegal. The remaining 66 may retroactively apply for construction permits, but under a Kafkaesque approval process, all may be demolished, replaced by parks, open spaces, restaurants, boutique hotels, and Jewish only housing – 70 Jewish families already living in Silwan. Others will follow, the same pattern repeated throughout the city – Palestinians displaced, their homes demolished and land expropriated to make all Jerusalem exclusively Jewish, in violation of international law, Fourth Geneva prohibiting property destruction and land seizures in occupied territory.

On June 26, the Palestine Monitor reported that “Hundreds of Israelis joined Palestinians and international peace activists in (Silwan) streets, (protesting) the decision to destroy Palestinian homes, (a) historic show of support….,” likely to fare no better than opposition to other Israeli plans over the past decade, failing to stop about 900 demolitions displacing Palestinians.

Through June 2009, the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) reported thousands more – an estimated 24,145 in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza since 1967, 4,247 alone during Cast Lead, others occurring regularly, illegal under international law, what Israel disdains and rejects, even though a signatory to many, including Geneva.

Under its illegal expropriation policy, B’Tselem reported that the “the Israeli government has choked (Palestinian) development and building….” In June 1967, it annexed nearly 18,000 acres in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, incorporating them within Jerusalem’s borders, over one-third expropriated, most of it Arab-owned, then used for thousands of Jews only housing, none for the city’s Palestinians.

“The Jerusalem Municipality did not establish outline plans for the Palestinian areas. The few (approved) plans….were primarily to prevent new construction by declaring broad expanses of land ‘green areas,’ restricting” construction. Overall, the Municipality enforces building laws “much more stringently” on Palestinians than on Jews, “even though the number of violations is much higher in the Jewish neighborhoods.”

East Jerusalem “Aggressive Urbanism”

The Civic Coalition for Defending Palestinians Rights in Jerusalem (CCDPRJ) is a non-profit NGO, “dedicated to the protection and promotion of Palestinian rights in Jerusalem.” In December 2009, it published a report titled, “Aggressive Urbanism: Urban Planning and the Displacement of Palestinians within and from Occupied East Jerusalem,” accessed through the following link:

http://www.ccdprj.ps/new/pdfs/Aggressive%20Urbanism%20Report.pdf

Since 1967, Israel has pursued a systematic home demolition/expropriation/displacement policy, illegally affecting thousands of Palestinian residents on the pretext of “unlicensed construction,” to achieve a “demographic balance” to consolidate Israel’s control of the city, taking it then to the next level, Judaizing all Jerusalem to make it exclusively Jewish.

To accomplish it, the Jerusalem Municipality and Interior Ministry “drafted, adopted and vigorously implemented a series of discriminatory laws, policies, and practices that collectively constitute the Israeli planning regime in occupied East Jerusalem,” authorizing confiscation of Palestinian land, restricting construction on the remainder, reducing building density, imposing a Kafkaesque building permit process, the result being to deny Palestinian rights on their own land, impose severe hardships, and force them to move and lose more, including their residency permits to return.

Without Israeli permission, those building new homes or extending existing ones risk demotions, fines, and displacement, a patently illegal process. Yet the Municipal authority “dictates where and when Palestinians can build,” as well as whether they can do it at all under the 1965 Israeli Planning and Building Law, providing “a thin veil of legitimacy” by systematically denying permits, prohibiting construction, and demolishing homes in violation.

This law, others, and official policies constitute Israel’s discriminatory, illegal planning system, implemented ruthlessly against Palestinians, given no recourse but to object and be denied nearly always. As a result, East Jerusalemites face an acute housing crisis, their right to live freely on their land denied, many forced to relocate or build without permits, risking recrimination and dispossession.

Amir Cheshin explained more about her experience under Teddy Kollek, saying:

“Israel has transformed urban planning into a tool in the hands of the Government whose object is to prevent the spread of the non-Jewish population of the city. This was (and remains) a cruel policy, if only by reason of the fact that it disregards the needs (and rights) of the Palestinian residents. Israel regarded the institution of a stringent urban planning policy as a way to restrict the number of new houses being constructed in Palestinian neighbourhoods (sic), and thus ensure that the percentage of Palestinian residents in the city’s population – 28.8% in 1967 – would not increase.”

“If we permit ‘too many’ new homes to be built in Palestinian neighbourhoods, that will mean ‘too many’ Palestinian residents in the city. The idea is to move as many Jewish residents as possible to Occupied East Jerusalem and to move as many Palestinians as possible out of the city altogether. Housing policy in Occupied East Jerusalem has focused on this numbers game.”

By so doing, it flouts international law, denies Palestinians their legal rights, imposes repression and violence under occupation, making Israel a rogue state, under lawless governments, defiling democratic principles of human rights, civil liberties, judicial fairness, and fundamental freedoms, ones afforded solely to Jews – how Israel has always been run.

  • Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/