Nakba: The Truth Will Set Free Jews and Arabs.

Sami Jamil Jadallah
Sami Jamil Jadallah

Sami Jamil Jadallah

 

As Palestinians and Arabs around the world remember the Nakba and the forced exile of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian, Israeli and other Jews are simultaneously celebrating their ‘victory’ and the establishment of a Zionist-Apartheid State.

 

The Israelis and Jews on this day and till today choose not to admit their crimes against the Palestinian people and on this day and till now Palestinians choose to ignore their failures. The truth will set the Jews and Arabs free.

 

Present-day Israel, contrary to what Zionist Israeli history might claim, was not made in heaven nor was it created by Moses or his G-d. Instead, it was established by an armed gang dedicated to the ethnic cleansing of Palestine from its native Arab people and the establishment of a state predicated on a racist ideology known as Zionism.

Continue reading

The Palestinians: The forgotten People

William James Martin

 

It is impossible to understand the present Palestinian/Israeli conflict without understanding the past, in particular, the 1948 ethnic cleansing of Palestine by Ashkenazi Jews from Eastern Europe, who are not Semitic people, but indigenous to Eastern Europe.

In 1900, there were no Ashkenazi Jews living in Palestine; essentially none, that is, but a few, small mostly temporary Russian Jewish settlers, not totally unusual for various cults in the Holy Land at that time. Theodore Herzl, frequently designated ‘The Father of Modern Zionism’, because of the publication of his book, The Jewish State, in 1896, and because of this founding of the World Zionist Congress, a year later stated in 1897: Continue reading

Israel vs Palestine; them and us

Palestine Israel Flag

Palestine Israel Flag

Palestine Israel Flag


Sami Jamil Jadallah, 11 May 2011

As Israel celebrate its 63rd anniversary, I could not help but compare the Zionist Israeli leadership to that of the Palestinian leadership past (Hajj Amin Husaini, Ahmed Shukairi and Yasser Arafat) and present (Abbas & Company) and what each achieved for their people in over 100 years of conflict? While one celebrate a nation, strong as ever (Peres) the other is wondering how to meet the current payroll? While one celebrates a nation with an army and institutions, the other promises the people a “virtual” state with none of the prerequisites of a modern nation state. While one talks of expanding and solidifying the Jewish Occupation, the other talks of reviving the PLO and restructuring the Palestine National Congress as if any one gives a damn about the PLO or its PNC.

Of course there are no comparisons between a leader like David Ben-Gurion and someone like Yasser Arafat. One dedicated his life to creating a nation out of remnant of people from over 120 countries, and succeeded in having a state with “state and governing institutions” on day one. While the other dedicated his life to political manipulation, lies, fraud, corrupting every thing around him and failing “his” people at every turn, never achieved liberation, ending the occupation, let all achieving let alone return of refugees. At best he returned to Palestine as a servant of the Jewish Occupation ending his life as hostage to his masters.

David Ben-Gurion and the Zionist leaders were able to create a state out of terrorism, armed struggle and powerful and manipulative international politics in the service of Israel, and never had to apologize for any thing, not the forced exile of 700,000 Palestinians, not the destruction of 500 villages, not the continued land theft for an ever expanding settlements, not the ethnic cleansing of Arabs from East Jerusalem, not the Apartheid Wall, not the many wars on Gaza and Lebanon.

Yasser Arafat and the Palestinian leadership on the other hand, not only failed to liberate and return the refugees, and never built “state institutions” always putting loyalty to the leadership ahead of any loyalty to country and cause. After 29 years (64-93) of claimed “liberation” Arafat ended up apologizing for all these years of ‘liberation” and defining then as acts of terrorism and violence (letter to Rabin) and after 47 years of the PLO, there is nothing to show for, not liberation, not return of refugees, not state or institution building, nothing but lies and deceptions, and a management and security contract with the Israeli Occupation.

David Ben-Gurion did not waste time, he worked on building state institutions while he was engaged in “wars of independence” and when he declared the State of Israel it had all the necessary institutions to operate and function as a state. Ben-Gurion did not invite his family and friends and associates to loot the country as Yasser Arafat did. And he did not invite Jewish business leadership and grant them “monopolies” over state resources as Arafat did, and he did not close his eyes on corrupt officials and associates as they went on to rob, fleece and abuse the system and build racketeering mafias out of “security services” or the military. David Ben-Gurion did not corrupt the World Zionist Organization and the Jewish Agency as Arafat did corrupting and bankrupting the PLO and the PNC, overlooking the billions stolen and remains unaccounted for. Ben-Gurion transformed the Israeli Aircraft Industry to a leader in arms and technology while Arafat transformed SAMED to canning “homous” and ‘embroidery factories” and then all disappeared under the management of his ally Ahmed Qurai.

There is no way to compare the Israeli leadership with that of the Palestinian. I am not aware of any Israeli leader who became multi-millionaire while serving the nation and the people while in public office as official. Not aware of any Israeli leaders who helped them selves to the national treasury take out tens of millions and send it to their wives in Paris or London or New York. Not aware of any Israeli leader who deposited donations and financial aids destined to the state or people and deposit these in his own private bank account, without any control or accountability.

Not aware of any Israeli leader in charge of “investment” were hundreds of millions lost or stolen and disappeared and never called for full accounting. Not aware of any Israeli leader or officials who made a fortune out of misfortune of the people. Not aware of any Israeli leaders whose family members were given contracts worth tens of millions simply because they are “family” members. Not aware of any Israeli leaders whose private company was given contracts worth hundreds of millions without any competitive and open bidding.

We know the late Yitzhak Rabin was forced to resign as Israeli prime minister because his wife kept a bank account in Washington worth couple of thousand dollars after her husband left office as Israeli ambassador. We also know the son of Ariel Sharon went to jail because he used his father’s connection to benefit himself and family.

Yasser Arafat was not forced to resign and never was questioned because he sent his wife millions of dollars from the people’s treasury? Was Mahmoud Abbas ever called to explain the financial deal he negotiated with Suha after her husband’s death, and did Israel negotiate a financial deal with the widows of Ben-Gurion or Rabin, and never negotiated a financial settlement with any widow of a leader who died or killed while on official assignment?

Why there was never an inquiry or accounting of the billions that went through Arafat private account and what happened to the accounts in Paris and in Geneva? And why no questioned Arafat as he did he collected “tax dollars” depositing it into his private accounts? Did any one ever open an inquiry to find out how members of the family (sons, cousins, wives, in-laws) of the leadership were able to build financial empires? And why no one wonder or raise question as heads of security services became multi-millionaires in no time? Did any one ever demand an accounting of why selected “Palestinian Oligarchy” were given special treatment and helped themselves to key sectors of the economy to loot? Questions that no members of the PNC or the Executive Committee raise certainly anyone in the leadership care to answer.

What we know is that the Palestinian leadership never bothered to operate a transparent accountable system and the PLO was and continues to operate as “private” closed corporation for the benefit of very few selected and self appointed members of the Executive Committee.

We never knew the hows and the why’s of the operation of the PLO and the Palestine National Congress. We know one thing for sure, the leadership decided on the numbers, it decided who will become a member, mainly representative of “fasael” or “resistance” or “dakakeen” and the rest were “notables” and Arafat loyalists, appointed and selected by Arafat to manipulate the entire PLO and PNC to serve his private narcissist purpose.

Never understood what is the role or function of the PNC if not as the “people representative body” to select and elect the executive leadership? To make policies and discuss and decide on all issues that relates to the people and nation of Palestine. And represent the interests of the people first and foremost and to hold the leadership accountable for all failures and use and misuse of public funds.

If we are to believe the lies of the leadership we need to question why there was never any investigation of any of the leadership failures in Jordan, in Lebanon, in Tunis, in Ramallah, in Oslo/ Why there was never an investigation of the missing or unaccounted for funds/ or why there was never an investigation into the murders committed in Tal-Zaater or Sabra and Shatilla? Or the “exile” from Kuwait?

Why there was never an open hearing or investigations of the many failed “military” operations that costs millions of dollars and cost the lives of thousands? Why there was never an inquiry or court martial of the “military” leadership that ran away from the battle field in Lebanon, abandoning troops, escaping to join the Chairman, and later promoted to generals and field marshals under Oslo? Why there was never an investigation of the circumstances that allowed the head of the Preventive Security to abandon his headquarters leaving his men and prisoners behind to meet certain death as Israeli bombed Preventive Security Forces.

Why did the PNC failed to take up the fight between Hamas and Fatah that ended with the routing of Fatah out of Gaza? Why did the PNC failed to take up the issue of negotiated deal between Dahlan and Mofaz, that allowed Israel to implement its total siege of Gaza? Why did the PNC failed to take up the issue of absence of or lack of “institutions” all these years? And why the leadership began to work on this only two years ago? Why the PNC failed to take up the issue of Oslo and its failings and why after 20 years, there are no “professional” non-partisan security forces?

Perhaps Mr. Mahmoud Abbas his many “special advisors” or members of the Executive Committee like Dr. Hanan Ashrawi or independent like Dr. Mustapha Bargouthi can answer all the whys. Perhaps they can tell us why we need to rebuild and restructure a totally failed, missing, disappeared or ceased to exist PLO? And why after all these years of Oslo there is an urgent need to give the PLO and PNC a priority.

Most important to the people is how a leadership like the present one that negotiated Oslo and continued to negotiate with Israel for the last 20 years can be trusted to negotiate a better deal than it negotiated in Oslo, and a better deal it offered to Israel as the Palestine Papers disclosed. The answer is obvious, it could not be trusted, and it lacks the integrity, the professionalism and the competency to achieve end of Occupation, East Jerusalem as nation capital, return of refugees and vacating of over 500,000 well armed Israeli trespassers and land thieves. And the lies continue.

Sami Jamil Jadallah

Sami Jamil Jadallah

Sami Jamil Jadallah is an international legal and business consultant and is the founder and director of Palestine Agency and Palestine Documentation Center www.palestineagency.com and founder and owner of several business in technology and services. Sami also runs an online website (Jefferson Corner). His articles are also featured on PalestineNote and Veterans Today.

Articles on RamallahOnline by Sami Jamil Jadallah

29 November 1947 – UN calls for creation of Jewish State + Arab State in Palestine

UN 1947 partition plan for Palestine (Photo source: Wiki - U.S. Central Intelligence Agency)

Marian Houk, 29 Nov 2010

That’s right: 63 years ago today, the UN General Assembly adopted resolution 181 which calls for the establishment of a Jewish State and an Arab State in Palestine.

For 63 years, the “international community” as we know it has backed the establishment of a Jewish State.

Six months later, the State of Israel was proclaimed as a Jewish state by virtue of UN General Assembly resolution 181.

And, though some argue otherwise, this is “international legitimacy” — a term coined by Palestinians, many of whom wish to preserve an option for their national rights based on UN resolutions and international treaties and various other agreements that are now called international law.

In November 1988, the Palestinians themselves declared independence, based on this same UN General Assembly resolution 181. But, it remains unrealized. Vague Palestinian pronouncements are met with threats against any “unilateral” actions — though Israel is perhaps the world’s foremost practitioner of “unilateral” actions , the country of “unilateral” actions par excellence .

So, how is it that we are all still talking past each other?

And, how did this situation come to be?

The “Allied” victors of World War I formed an international organization, which they called the League of Nations, which was based in Geneva.

Britain was pleased to have been awarded the Palestine Mandate — a move which it itself engineered — by the League of Nations, several years after British troops marched out of Egypt and swept up in a crescent to Jerusalem by December 1918, and then moving on to Iraq.

After years of carrying out a military administration of the Palestine Mandate — and before it was actually offically awarded as a Mandate — Britain had already divided it into two parts: “Palestine”, and “Transjordan”.

The Jewish immigration that Britain was enjoined by the League of Nations to encourage was, thus, restricted to “Palestine” (and excluded from “Transjordan”).

The Palestine Mandate was officially awarded to Britain by the Council of the League of Nations only after the official surrender of the Ottoman Empire, which took place at a Conference in Lausanne in 1923 — only after a lot of hard bargaining by Turkey (the Ottoman successor).

Within a decade, the League of Nations was gradually paralyzed by its members’ bad behavior, and had already suspended functioning by the time the Second World War broke out.

Meanwhile, Britain was supposed to encourage the development of the two communities in Palestine, but was really rather bad at managing the communal conflict that developed alongside increased Jewish immigration.

By the end of World War II, Britain simply wanted to get out of Palestine.

Concurrently, the Allied victors of the Second World War had formed the United Nations (UN), as the successor organization to the League of Nations.

Britain asked the UN General Assembly to decide how to dispose of the Palestine Mandate awarded by the League of Nations.

After months of deliberatation, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 181 on 29 November 1947. Britain announced it would pull its troops out by mid-May 1948. And, as it did so, the State of Israel was proclaimed, from Tel Aviv, as a Jewish State (not one mention of it being “democratic”, a much more recent concept, enunciated only after the fall of the Soviet Union at the end of the 1980s.

By November 1988, the Palestinian leadership said that although they didn’t like Resolution 181 very much, it nevertheless provided the basis for the Declaration of an independent Palestinian state.

Now, after a prolonged and agonizing labor, are we facing a dangerous delivery by forceps?

Israel’s continued military occupation of what is left of Palestine has caused a miserable postponement of Palestinian self-determination.

Today, in Geneva, Richard Falk — an America, Professor Emeritus at Princeton University, and an expert on international law who is also currently the UN Human Rights Council’s Special Rapporteur on Palestinian rights, According to a press release from the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva, Falk today “stressed the need to impose ’some outer time limit after which further occupation becomes a distinct violation of international law, and if not promptly corrected, constitutes a new type of crime against humanity’.”

The press release was entitled, more straight to the point, “Prolonged occupation, a new type of crime against humanity”.

Falk said that he “wished to express sympathy for the Palestinian people who continue after more than 43 years to live under Israeli occupation that daily violates many of their fundamental and inalienable human rights. Above all, the failure to resolve the underlying conflict between Palestine and Israel in such a manner as to realize after decades of delay the Palestinians’ right to self-determination is of urgent concern. It should be observed, also, that negotiation between the parties to the conflict needs to be guided by the implementation of several principles of international law if a settlement of the conflict is to achieve Palestinian self-determination. These principles, as set forth in the General Assembly Resolution 48/158, 20 December 1993, include the following: (1) withdrawal from Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem; (2) resolving the Palestinian refugee problem in accordance with General Assembly Resolution 181 and subsequent resolutions; (3) dismantling settlements established during the occupation; (4) fixing of secure and internationally recognized borders; (5) guaranteeing free access to sacred sites and religious buildings throughout historic Palestine. A peace process that does not heed these guidelines, with appropriate degrees of flexible implementation, cannot realize either self-determination for the Palestinian people or peace with security and justice for both Palestinians and Israelis”.

Falk added that “it is important to ponder the special consequences of prolonged occupation and refugee status, which inflicts serious physical and mental harm on Palestinians living under occupation [n.b. -- as it also does to many Palestinian refugees and their descendants living outside the occupied territories, several hundreds of thousands of whom still live in refugee camps...]. International humanitarian law was developed under the assumption that occupation would be temporary and short-lived. The Palestinian experience suggests the need for a new protocol of international humanitarian law that addresses the distinctive situation of prolonged occupation and refugee status, imposing some outer time limit after which further occupation becomes a distinct violation of international law, and if not promptly corrected, constitutes a new type of crime against humanity. The United Nations and the international community as a whole will be judged in the future by whether effective action is now taken to end the humanitarian catastrophe that has befallen the Palestinian people. In this respect, the United Nations, the governments and the peoples of the world will all be judged complicit to the extent that this persistent violation of fundamental human rights is endured without taking the necessary steps in a spirit of urgency and commitment to bring this abusive occupation to an end and achieve Palestinian self-determination in accordance with international law and the dictates of global justice”.

His statement can be consulted in full here.

Marian Houk PASSIA 2004

In the photo below, taken at a roundtable discussion in Jerusalem in July 2004, Marian Houk is the woman wearing the sort-of-orange-colored eyeglasses. Photo courtesy of PASSIA:

Marian Houk, a writer, reporter, journalist and analyst with long experience at the United Nations — in New York and in Geneva and more — as well as with the Middle East. She has reported on, and for a time also worked for, the United Nations. She is a former President of the United Nations Correspondents Association (UNCA) at UNHQ/NY (1986), and is currently based in Jerusalem.

Marian Houk is the Editor of UN-Truth news site.

Israel’s New Land Grab Master Plan

Stephen Lendman

Stephen Lendman, 24 July 2010

The new plan updates older ones, going back to the first, what Israeli historian Ilan Pappe documented in his 2006 book, “The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine,” on David Ben-Gurion’s Plan D (Dalet in Hebrew), his final master plan following Plans A, B and C, what Palestinians call the Nakba, the catastrophe, commemorated annually to never forget.

By bombarding and besieging villages and population centers, destroying communities, and expelling or killing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, it planned an exclusive Jewish state, excluding Arabs by any means, including mass-murder, dispossession, and persecution, ongoing to this day, what Palestinians heroically resist.

It took six months to complete, expelling or slaughtering about 800,000 people, and destroying 531 villages and 11 urban neighborhoods in Tel-Aviv, Haifa, Jerusalem and other cities. It was barbarous ethnic cleansing, Palestinians shown no mercy, including women and children, yet it was just the beginning, much more yet to come, including new ethnic cleaning plans.

Old and New Master Plans

The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA) is an Israeli policy research organization, its president Dore Gold, a notorious right-wing extremist, hostile to democratic principles and Palestinian rights.

It’s recent report is titled “Demography, Geopolitics, and the Future of Israel’s Capital: Jerusalem’s Proposed Master Plan,” explaining that on October 7, 2008, the District Planning and Construction Commission for the Jerusalem region proposed one, approved by Mayor Nir Barkat, then revised “to create and preserve a stable Jewish majority in the unified capital,” assure the city always stays unified, and follows Ben-Gurion’s idea:

to “bring Jews to eastern Jerusalem at any cost. We must settle tens of thousands of Jews in a brief time. Jews will agree to settle in eastern Jerusalem even in shacks. We cannot await the construction of orderly neighborhoods. The essential thing is that Jews will be there.”

In large numbers they’re displacing Palestinians, destroying their homes, seizing their land, and fulfilling Ben-Gurion’s dream to make Israel exclusively Jewish, Jerusalem its capital.

The city’s 1968 Master Plan recommended accelerated Jewish population growth. In 1973, Prime Minister Golda Meir planned to increase it by 3.7% by 1982. Various other plans followed.

Master Plan 2000 aimed to preserve a Jewish majority, its planners apprehensive about Arab population growth. As a result, they proposed “intervention tools” to counter it by:

“a sufficient supply of housing by building new neighborhoods and reinforcing and increasing the density of veteran Jewish (ones), as well as adding places of employment and services on a quantitative and qualitative basis.”

The June 2009 Arbel Report proposed annexing part of Ramat Rahel, located on a hilltop halfway between Jerusalem’s Old City and Bethlehem, to accommodate a growing Jewish population.

A July 2009 Master Plan for Transportation in Jerusalem revealed 13,300 newly approved housing units and another 15,000 at other stages of planning, suggesting an urgency to complete them and add more based on population growth forecasts.

Planned land seizures weren’t mentioned. However, Jerusalem’s Master Plan 2000 said the following:

“The most severe problem in eastern Jerusalem is the absence of a system to resolve land ownership. This problem, in combination with a deliberate policy by both nationalist and criminal elements, has led to a huge volume of illegal construction (without required permits) on lands that were intended for public purposes and a takeover of privately owned lands….In order to solve the problem, a special judicial system should be established in the municipality to regulate the registration of land ownership” to assure Jews are preferentially treated.

Jerusalem Master Plan 2010

On June 28, Haaretz writers Akiva Eldar and Nir Hasson headlined, “Jerusalem master plan: Expansion of Jewish enclaves across the city,” saying it calls for expanding Jewish neighborhoods in East Jerusalem, “a move largely based on construction on privately owned Arab property,” meaning Palestinians will be removed to accommodate them.

On July 10, Haaretz writer Don Futterman headlined, “The Jerusalem Master Plan for destruction,” saying it plans “to relocate as many Arabs as possible to the margins of the municipal boundaries; to promote overcrowding (in their areas) in the hope (they) will leave the city of their own accord,” develop their own neighborhoods, encouraged by “accelerate(d) evictions and house demolitions.”

“The plan plays into both the settler-led campaign to (de-Arabize) the Old City, and the government’s efforts to make sure Jerusalem will never be the capital of a Palestinian state….” Will it work? Before he died, Edward Said said the following:

“There is no way for Israel to get rid of Palestinians. (They) shar(e) the land that has thrust (them) together (and must do it jointly) in a truly democratic way, with equal rights for (all) citizen(s),” Jews, Arabs, Christians, and others. No master plan will prevent it,

Yet Israel’s new one includes accelerated home demolitions and land seizures, Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein telling the High Court that the government plans to apply the 1950 Absentees’ Property Law (ABL), authorizing the state to seize abandoned properties. At risk are thousands of acres worth billions of dollars, land legally held by Arabs.

Haaretz writer Akiva Eldar said:

“The state intends to assume control over properties of people who moved to ‘enemy states’ during the War of Independence (now refugees denied the right of return), as well as structures in East Jerusalem,” belonging to West Bank and Gaza residents.

They’ll be used for new Jewish developments besides others underway or planned, sparking protests met with attacks and arrests, a recent Silwan one assaulted with live fire, tear gas, and percussion grenades. One Palestinian lost an eye. A woman miscarriaged from tear gas, another also after her home was invaded.

Five Palestinians were arrested, including a 12-year old child. Dr. Mustafa Barghouti, Secretary General of al-Mubadara Palestinian National Initiative, accused Israel of attempting to Judaize East Jerusalem with “bulldozers, the expansion of the settlement units, (and) changing the demographic composition of the city to favor” Jews over Arabs, the final plan to make Jerusalem exclusively Jewish by any means.

Israel acts ruthlessly, does what it pleases with no regard for the law, internal or external pressure, or the rights and needs of indigenous Palestinians, being systematically removed for Jewish expansion, a Palestinian official saying it’s to “decapitate” East Jerusalem’s Arab identity by building thousands of Jewish-only apartments and homes on Arab-owned land.

They’re being squeezed into narrower spaces, currently confined to about 13% of the city, the rest seized since 1967 when East Jerusalem was occupied. Palestinian Authority (PA) official Ghassan Al-Khatib called it “more than a provocation. It is actually a decapitation of the peace process. (It won’t) withstand the reported plan to expand Jewish settlements in Jerusalem.” Others say it’s a prescription for resistance and violence. A recently released blueprint calling for expanding Jewish neighborhoods on privately owned Palestinian land assures it, especially if as widespread as envisioned to Judaize the entire city.

On July 20, the International Middle East Media Center’s Brian Ennis headlined, “Palestinians in East Jerusalem Feeling Abandoned,” given the “specter of more housing demolition and (Judaization) of East Jerusalem,” the international community doing nothing to prevent it, or help Israeli Arabs – Israel’s Blacks and Latinos, lawlessly persecuted, shamelessly denied their rights.

Targeting Israeli Arabs

On July 20, London Observer writer Harriet Sherwood headlined, “Jaffa’s Arab haven of coexistence resists influx of Israeli hardliners,” saying:

Its Ajami neighborhood, south of Tel-Aviv, has seen “every stone and blade of grass” bitterly contested, now “the centre of a struggle that touches on social, religious, nationalist, economic and legal questions and which – whatever the outcome – will inevitably result in further strife.”

Until recently, it was one of Israel’s few areas where Jews and Muslims coexisted for decades, though never easily. However, destabilization and strife threatens to erupt if a 20-apartment development is approved, an Israeli High Court ruling imminent, the result of a case brought by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), claiming it discriminates against Arabs and non-religious Jews in favor of Zionist extremists demanding it go ahead to create “a religious community free from non-Jewish and secular influences,” their own exclusive gated community.

Historian Sami Abu Shehadeh said if they succeed, “the (neighborhood) will be polarized. (People who) say Jaffa is a model of coexistence will be silenced.” Judaization will assure it and encourage more in Israel, the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

He called the whole neighborhood “a construction site. We – the Arabs – are being forced out again, but we have nowhere else to go.” Building permits aren’t granted, and locals say 500 families have been issued eviction or demolition orders. Others got huge fines. The entire Arab population faces an uncertain future, like other Israeli Arabs, not wanted, denied their rights, and being systematically pressured to make way for Jews.

Another way is a proposed measure requiring they pledge loyalty to a “Jewish and Democratic state,” mainly Palestinian men and women who marry Israeli citizens (an estimated 25,000), then seek citizenship on the basis of family reunification, the latter already denied without Interior Ministry approval, for most impossible to get.

On July 19, Jerusalem Post writer Herb Keinon said the measure hadn’t yet passed, contrary to other accounts. He called it a way to “deter Palestinians from asking for citizenship.” The government said it’s only for “illegal residents,” not Israeli Arabs, but if extremist Yisrael Beitneinu party officials prevail, including David Rotem, Chairman of the Knesset Constitution and Avigdor Lieberman, Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, all Israeli Arabs will have to pledge loyalty to a “Jewish, Zionist, and democratic State,” its emblems and values, and perform military or equivalent service as a condition for a national ID card signifying citizenship and right to stay in the country legally.

Final Comments

Palestinians and Israeli Arabs have reason to worry, Haaretz writer Amira Hass providing more evidence in her July 21 article headlined, “IDF destroys West Bank village after declaring it a military zone,” saying:

The army demolished an entire Jordan Valley village after declaring it within a closed military zone, 55 structures and 120 farmers, workers, and their families left without homes in Farasiya. Earlier the Civil Administration cut off their water, and before that the military destroyed a distribution pipe from a nearby stream, what residents built for irrigation.

Last year, they were prohibited from connecting to wells belonging to Mekorot, Israel’s National Water Company, forcing them to use saltwater for their livestock and buy expensive private water for themselves, what most can’t afford.

B’Tselem photographer Atef Abu, arriving hours after the demolition, said “mattresses, pipes and broken furniture were lying on the ground in the debris.”

On July 18, 10 Bardala village families (north of Farasiya) also got demolition orders, a farmer with 300 sheep “told to leave in 24 hours or his herd would be confiscated.”

In Israel and throughout the Territories, millions of Palestinians are endangered, their lives and livelihoods threatened by Israel’s longstanding plan to Judaize all “Eretz Yisrael,” no matter that indigenous Arabs lived there for centuries and have legal right to their homes and property.

No wonder Haaretz writer Gideon Levy sees Israel “sinking into a strident, nationalistic atmosphere and darkness is beginning to cover everything, (evidenced by) jingoism, ruthlessness and vengeance, (its extremist voices) now expressing its heart,” Palestinians feeling the affects, collectively punished for being Muslims under Jewish domination – racist, lawless and merciless, for Levy, a “sign of how we have lost our senses and humanity,” for historians, a prescription for self-destruction.

  • Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
  • http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/